Huh!?

I was looking for something like this, thanks alot!

the f-35B can

Ummm... I'm pretty sure China doesn't have four Liaoning-class aircraft carriers. I'm also fairly certain that the F-35C can't fly off the Queen Elizabeth-class carriers and Japan only has two Izumo-class and Hyuga-class carriers each, not four.

Good thanks

Yepp. =)

hello you still working on this?

New 1.04a version is out. Some minor fixes and Kinmen Island was included.

Hi! New version 1.04 is OUT! Say hello to whole ROC Navy and land-based SSMs! =)

And you can find the ship details in zh/wikipedia

PLAN have only 4 094 SSBN and one of them is 094A

There are some mistakes in the ship numbers and the deployment

Yay

Courting Carcass
"are you planning to add any american carrier groups?"

Yeah, but slightly later. It will be in v1.05. =)

p.s.
ROC ships will be added in 1.04.

p.p.s.
A some kind of global team? You can use this scen as you wish, with small credits to me, but i will not participate in it, cause i work at my own pace and already have enough obligations in my life.

SL318
Oh, don’t worry. There is “what-if” component in scenario, and this is ok for this genre. This is due to differences in peacetime and wartime deployments, a sharp changes in the construction-decommission of equipment depending on the likelihood of conflict, military secrecy, incompleteness and contradictions of open sources. And we must consider and use this "gray zone".

The same is true for a list of ships. We have already decom. ships (EU), ships that are under construction (China) and some interesting hypothetical ships (EU, Japs). Yes, this is also a deliberate thing.

I have enough sources to make a scenario 1:1, with the exact unit names, accurate _peacetime_ deploy-s, etc. But this huge "gray zone" will still exist. And the playability - in a huge scen, i would rather give the player a wing of planes and time for his own management, than i will send him under an huge X+0 attack with open-sources deploy-t, which is simply not intended to repel any attack at all.

Great work ! Though I just open the scenario and use order of battle to give a glance on it. For all AB there are probably no problem with them. Satellite should mark what they are at. But there are plenty mistake on Naval units like PLAN only have 2 052B , 6 052C , 2 054 , for French navy they only built 2 Horizon class. Invincible class and Type-42 batch3 are all decommission etc..... ROCN(Taiwan Navy) are even don't exist.
Also most of Air units in Taiwan AB all incorrect. Mirage are deploy in Hsinchu AB, IDF in Ching-Chuan-Kang and Tainan AB , F-16 in Chiayi and Hualien AB. E-2, EC-130, S-2T, P-3 are in Pingtung AB by the way I think these huge project need a global team to make sure every things are right. The people from their country will be most familiar with their country's units and military deployment.

are you planning to add any american carrier groups?

"I think most confuse part of PLARF is how much CJ/DF-10 brigade they have."

I think that 6 Bde's with 108 missiles each will be ok. I have some sources that talks about 550 CJ-10.Yes, i some have doubts about what the authors mean in these sources. Do they talk about 550 CJ-10 in total or about 550 GLCM only? But for now I will use the maximum value.

"About DF-26,I think it have one brigade with conventional warhead and one with ASBM MOD,most of nuclear warhead is in DF-5/31/41 and JL-2"

I have some mixed solution, so i have included 4 mixed divisions, with 8 nuclear, 4 conventional and 12 ASBM DF-26's in each.

Version 1.03 was released! Say hello to a PLARF, i.e. chinese SIOP force. Lets make some nukes! =)

I think most confuse part of PLARF is how much CJ/DF-10 brigade they have.About DF-26,I think it have one brigade with conventional warhead and one with ASBM MOD,most of nuclear warhead is in DF-5/31/41 and JL-2

"If you can add PLARF into this scen,it will be wonderful."
I will try. (Tshhh! All ICBMs and IRBMs are done. I was little stuck with distribution of DF-26 versions - i.e conventional-nuclear-asbm's, in percents, due classified nature of new systems of this class, but i have some very nice working solution...)

If you can add PLARF into this scen,it will be wonderful

"Did you have PLARF's OOB?"
Yes. I have some drafts. Do you need it in this scen too? =)

Did you have PLARF's OOB?

Thank you very much. I hope that this stuff is helpful for you. =)

Impressive template, thank you for all the work. Its very useful!

Cheers for the heads up. Keep up the good work mate!

Please download it again. New version 1.02 with bug-fixes and improvements is out.

Thank you too. =)

Stunning work and level of detail!

good stuff.

Thank you very much. =)

Awesome！