who ho ho! SWEET!

this is mine to drive?

woah...

This is a good skin, thanks.

lol how do you know i dont? you havent asked me any questions.

I'm not the one who doesn't know anything about economic policies.

im not the one avoiding answering questions...

Just...stop. You're already embarassing yourself.

lol i dont watch msnbcommunist or "faux news" and im still trying to get my parents to understand libertarianism.. can you tell me what cronyism is?

Just stop. You know nothing of Capitalism nor Communism, to any degree, to make any valid comments about them. Seriously. Read anything about the matter, and don't read it from biased websites. Not MSNBC. Not Faux News. Not your conservative parents. Get educated, because you're just embarassing yourself.

what if i told you we have a common enemy and capitalists arent it...

The revolution quotes are about past revolutions, where the social triangle was always in place, even then the lower classes tried to topple them. Communism tries to remove that by giving the means of production to the workers themselves instead of one corporation. And yes, English is my first language, unlike you, where being 12 years old is a language. "iv read enough quotes.' Literate genius right there.

Because what they believed in wasn't Communism. I've said it before, there has been no instance of Communism that has been placed as an official Economic structure. It was all Capitalism, like what Faux News is trying to protect you dumbass.

also im going to take your response as a "no, my first language is not english."

and before you tell me it isnt a hateful book, then explain why every communist in history was hellbent on destroying everyone. (lenin, stalin, mao, che guevera, etc.)

iv read enough quotes out of it to know its all about hateful methods of revolution. and yes im well aware that means of production does not equal property. thats what i said. there is no such thing as property in communism because you are not allowed to own anything for yourself. only the collective.

Means of production =/= property, or any whole sale good, like a single computer. Go back to Faux Newz for your conspiracy shit. Oh, and while you're at it, read the Communist Manifesto instead of being told of what is in it. Dumbass.

is english your first language? cuz you keep repeating back to me what i already said to you...

I'll give you a hint: the means of production are owned. Not property. That is Communism. It isn't one entity owning everything, it's the community owning it. I'll say it again because you have no idea what I said. Means. Of. Production. Look it up.

Uhh, maybe because we aren't in a Communist state...? Perhaps, that is what is going on? Yes, I did say "common." And I haven't played enough of Civ 5 to pick a favorite. You are all over the board here.

there is no need for currency, you just take what you feel you need. by buying trackmania, you ultimately fueled capitalism. even if you say "communism is for making products for the sake of products" you still fueled capitalism because you bought a game published by ubisoft which is one of the largest megacorporations in gaming and is no better in terms of caring about their customers than Electronic Arts.

and no, its from the word community. as in community/commonly owned. as in there is no personal property. only collective property. when you have collective property there is no such thing as "products." "products" imply's that you are making a product for consumer use. in communism there are no consumers because there is no economy. everyone owns everything but no one owns anything for just themselves. there is no need for products because everything you own is owned by everyone else also. you cant make a product to sell because if you sold it you would be making a personal gain which would be against the need of the "collective" and the greater good. in communism you are not allowed to own anything for youself. everything belongs to everyone.

lol it may look like im changing the subject but im not. so im gonna ask this again. what social policies do you tend to choose when you play civ 5.

And I said it in german.

I like how you're changing the subject.

i noticed you enjoy civilization 5. tell me, what social policy trees do you normally choose?

yes, now tell me why it comes from the word common and what other word it is based off of. the more specific word.

Actually it's from the german word, "allgemein"

"communism does not involve making products at all." You were the person who said that, not me. And it's latin from "common"

btw, i wouldnt rely on an economy class for my knowledge on economics. liberal college professors are often found to lead gullible students astray.

too much stupidity in one book. i have a feeling you dont even know what the word communism is derived from.

I suggest you read the Communist Manifesto.

i suggest you read "the giver."

communism does not involve making products at all. it involves no private ownership, while everyone owns everything. there is no money involved in an actual communist society.

wow.. communists are so stupid, they cant even remember what communism is..

What? Buying the game has nothing to do with Capitalism. Capitalism is only making the game for the money involved, like what China is doing right now: abusing human rights to get the lowest possible production cost. Communism is making products for the sole of making it. If a neighbour is making terrible shirts, you can step in and make better ones. I make this car so other people didn't have to. (Fun fact: There has been no country that has officially used Communism as an economic system. It was all a pseudo carbon copy capitialism enviroment). Fantastic what you can learn from an economics class.

Get. Fucking. #rekt.

i know communists hate capitalism which you supported by buying a game. who's slow now, stupid. or did you pirate it?

Hmm, somebody doesn't know anything about communism. (A.K.A. you, since you seem to be a bit on the slow side.)

*facepalm* dumbtard BUYS a game and then promotes communism.. proof that communists are retards..

ha, lol. (first comment) (duh)