Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
I'm not sure what the vision is behind these changes, but if the goal is to avoid player criticism, please consider that forcing a single, rigid path is more likely to generate frustration. I genuinely hope future updates can focus on expanding possibilities and tools for the player, rather than building walls and checklists around the content.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
However, I'd like to respectfully offer some feedback regarding a recent design direction that I find concerning. There seems to be a growing trend in FU towards forcing players into specific questlines and grind-heavy processes, such as the mandatory collection of FU-specific items to progress. A recent example is the change to how dungeon content is gated, moving it from organic discovery on the star chart or planet surfaces to a NPC-driven main quest.