Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Think of it like this, both the FALCOR and the HEPT are *technically* standalone. They don't interface with each other directly, but with what ever API exists.
The only commonality is the loader.
The HEPT was never really designed to take lenses. This has to do mainly with the power balancing system, having two different lenses would do major wonky things to the math.
That being said, with changes to the game it might be needed to keep things competitive, but it would require a rework that would not be done for awhile. (I work quite often right now)
Also for build cost, what are you thinking of by chance (I'm curious what others think in this regard)