Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem









And far as I can tell, most of these opinions against LW 2 were born before 1.5 update, I think (might be wrong) including Beagle's. So, there. Anyway, won't spam your post no mo
But either way, LW 2 is unarguably simply a better version of Xcom 2. I do mean unarguably, because it's straight up a guerilla warfare experience. The only reason anyone should play Xcom 2 over LW 2 is if they find LW 2 too Long, or if they want to play Wizards of The Coast. So, fair. But if you're sayin that you don't particularly like LW 2, it's pretty obvious you've spent about 1 hour max playing it.