Store Page
X4: Foundations
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

X4: Foundations

Store Page
X4: Foundations >  Workshop > Chem O`Dun's Workshop
77 ratings
Lost Ships Replacement Enabler
Description Discussions0 Comments22 Change Notes
2
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
File Size
Posted
24.893 KB
1 Mar @ 4:58pm
1 Change Note ( view )
Links
On Youtube (External link) On Reddit (External link)
Created by
Chem O`Dun
Offline
See all 191 collections created by Chem O`Dun and other people (some may be hidden)
12,869 Unique Visitors
2,640 Current Subscribers
214 Current Favorites

Subscribe to download
Lost Ships Replacement Enabler

In 1 collection by Chem O`Dun
Lost Ship Replacement: Fixed and Improved
4 items
Description
In X4: Foundations, the Lost Ships Replacement feature was introduced in version 7.50. This feature allows the fleet to request a replacement ship if the ship was lost during the execution of the order. The replacement ship will be requested automatically, and the fleet will continue to execute the order.
However, even if you enable the Lost Ships Replacement feature for a fleet, the replacement ship will not be requested during the execution of the "default" orders. The replacement ship will only be requested after restarting the order.
This extension fixes this issue for some of them:
  • Patrol
  • Police
  • Protect Position
  • Protect Ship
  • Protect Station

Compatibility

This extension is compatible with the following versions:
  • X4: Foundations version 7.50

Usage

Simple install the extension and use the orders as usual.
One recommendation - better to restart the orders before the enabling the Lost Ships Replacement feature.

Links

There is a thread on EGOSOFT forum - [Mod/AIScript] Lost Ships Replacement Enabler[forum.egosoft.com]
22 Comments
< >
Hebrux 27 Sep @ 4:04pm 
In vanilla, I don't think it lets you set replacement for nested subordinates. For example, Nested Destroyer B is a subordinate but I can't place a replacement order for Destroyer B's fighters
Chem O`Dun  [author] 27 Sep @ 3:59pm 
It simple solves an issue, when if ship in some order, the replacement is not started, despite it enabled.
But set the replacement for ships you have on your own
Hebrux 27 Sep @ 1:48pm 
Does this allow for the replacement of subordinate subordinates?
For example, Destroyer A has subordinate destroyer B. Destroyer B has a fighter group.

Will this allow me to replenish Destroyer B's fighter group?
Chem O`Dun  [author] 2 Jul @ 2:54pm 
If you have no issue with it - then not use it.
At least I can't see the significant changes in related part of code ...
But testing is simple - set appropriate order for your ships fleet, enable replacement, and then destroy one subordinate ...
Who 1 Jul @ 7:34am 
Is this still needed, as in not fixed by the devs?
Chem O`Dun  [author] 18 Mar @ 9:20am 
Another LSR improvement is coming. I hope - today ...:steamhappy:
Chem O`Dun  [author] 11 Mar @ 5:06pm 
And in parallel
@gorgofdoom and @Strategist Bu Shia
I made a fix to show the hidden crew on Replacement ships

https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3442684328
Chem O`Dun  [author] 11 Mar @ 5:04pm 
There are only +4 positive votes leaves :steamhappy:to make ratings show ...
Chem O`Dun  [author] 8 Mar @ 7:36am 
Just curious what is wrong with mod, why somebody don't "like" it?
gorgofdoom 5 Mar @ 8:38am 
Just something to mention, not sure if its relevant, but ships only need to be filled with 50% crew members for their max bonus.

"Dummy crew" sounds like they don't have a job. It is possible for crew to be aboard a ship that do not have a job-- only ways i know this is caused in the course of play is by picking up escape pods or by capturing a ship which either already has prisoners, or by beating a yaki boarding party to the ship. (the boarders wind up as prisoners, who are essentially jobless crew)

:cozyjunimogreen: