Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I hate you hesse)
probably not, last time when i asked around if i should nerf this the consensus is pretty overwhelmingly "no"
I've actually gone back to not using this because I find that when the combat AI randomly drops 85% of an army into a fight to defend a small battle, particularly on fronts with large states and low infra, the 10x tends to mean you quickly lose ground in messy ways that aren't readily reclaimed. (Think Amazonas being captured from Guyana before more logical coastal states, or fronts fracturing around unexpectedly durable partial occupations in Darfur.)