Abonnera för att ladda ner
Irrigated Cattle Ranching

You have my permission to re-upload your version of this mod to steam.

sure, All I did was comment out the production connect then changed it to a type_powerplant (the 25 production is just for testing use) and the second station is me just testing out how to add more stations (I keep forgetting which direction X Y Z represents in game compared to script

$NAME_STR " Large Fish"


$TYPE_POWERPLANT
$SUBTYPE_SHIP

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$HEATING_DISABLE
$ELECTRIC_DISABLE
$WATERSEWAGE_DISABLE
$WASTE_PRODUCTION_DISABLE
$NO_LIFESPAN

$IGNORE_COUNT_LIMIT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ANIMATION_MESH_WORKSHOP anim.nmf
anim.naf

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ELETRIC_WITHOUT_WORKING_FACTOR 1
#$PRODUCTION_CONNECT_TO_SUN 60
###max prod@ 60% sun

$PRODUCTION livestock 25.0

$STORAGE_EXPORT RESOURCE_TRANSPORT_LIVESTOCK 5000

$HARBOR_OVER_WATER_FROM 100
$HARBOR_OVER_TERRAIN_FROM 100

$SHIP_STATION 60 0 -20 -60 0 -20
$SHIP_STATION 60 0 20 -60 0 20

end

###RtS

Can you share the relevant scripts?

I've got it untied to wind or solar and set to 0 workers and it seems to work

Yeah, I’ve have a local version of that mod and it works, but when tied to solar or wind, makes them not available for early start. And without wind or solar, they require workers to produce anything. 🤷‍♂️

so I found this out while fiddling with the fishing mod to be able to place the fish spawn, apparently the $NO_LIFESPAN works on powerplants without causing problems (and yes powerplants can indead produce livestock apparently and the game seems to be ok with it)

yeah I just tried using it on a factory myself (since the ranches are considered factories) but I'm getting the same problem.

The $NO_LIFESPAN tag does not seem to work.

It just returns an error that "the machines are broken."

If you know exactly how to get this working then I will consider implementing the change but for now it has to be rolled back.

Thanks, I will look into adding that line soon.