Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It looks like the issue mentioned below is indeed with the naming conventions changing for some building sets:
1) wh_main_set_empire_temple is NOW wh_main_set_empire_military_support
2) wh2_mnain_set_lizard_temple is now wh2_main_set_lizardmen_military_support (interestingly, the game also seems to include those lizardmen building chains in wh2_main_set_lzd, although I'm not sure why the chains are in both sets)
Swapping out the names (and probably adding a couple lines for the wh2_main_set_lzd) in both db --> building_set_to_building_junctions_tables and db --> building_sets_tables should get those factions to work normally.
I poked around with my extremely limited skills in RPFM, and the only spots I can find those chains referenced is in db --> building_set_to_building_junctions_tables and db --> building_sets_tables. Of note, I did NOT see any duplication among dwarf settlements with resource chains (also mentioned in those sections of the pack file).
Perhaps there was a naming convention or syntax change with the December update for some building chains?