Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem










I have a question about the mod settings: I have run quite a few games using 3x for tech/culture cost, extreme era scaling (for both science and culture), and all other parameters set to "calculated" (era score, age progression, CO2 levels,...).
Is this the "most optimal" setup? Or should I use different parameters?
Last game I ended up in 1970 when the world barely reached Renaissance Age, while I was already going for Nuclear fusion tech. Something is definitely wrong.
Thanks for the help.
Imo, this is like playing chess where every piece is a Queen, it removes a lot of the fun from the games depth and critical thinking skills.
Because Firaxis never seemed to care to balance out tech or civic progression much as they added content and the pacing became just awful the more DLC they put out.
And the modularity on this is wonderful. Excellent work all around!