Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i will upload it to SFMlab soon
(www.sfmlab.com)
(and for the model)
I have also considered this problem. Before I made this model, I checked the cupcake model in the workshop and found that there was a very popular cupcake model.The model looked realistic and should be classified as a real object, so I wanted to make a cartoon cupcake.
Not only that, my original intention was to add some objects to the MLP to make the number of MLP models in the workshop look less pitiful.The purpose of the "for MLP" tag is to show my model when the user searches for the "MLP" note.Of course, what you said is also true. Only marking "for MLP" will limit the potential. I will add "can be used in any situation, not limited to MLP" in the first sentence of the model introduction.Thank you very much!!!! :D
Cupcakes (and other useful food and stuff) can be used with everything not just MLP,
so saying that its "for MLP" will harm the potential of the model due to there being a lot of people that don't like the show.
A "fix" to this would be preferred, but not necessary.