Store Page
Train Simulator Classic 2024
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Train Simulator Classic 2024

Store Page
Train Simulator Classic 2024 >  Workshop > MaTT's Workshop
193 ratings
The Deerstalker (Standard version)
Description Discussions0 Comments21 Change Notes
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Train Simulator Routes: Settle to Carlisle, Edinburgh - Glasgow
Tags: modern, europe, diesel, Class 67, Class 170
File Size
Posted
102.977 KB
12 Jul, 2013 @ 7:13am
1 Change Note ( view )
Created by
MaTT
Online
See all 10 collections (some may be hidden)
1,548 Unique Visitors
539 Current Subscribers
15 Current Favorites

Subscribe to download
The Deerstalker (Standard version)

Description
Take the Fort William portion of the Highland Sleeper as far as Ashfield for a crew Change Duration : 60 mins Difficulty : Easy

This is a cut down version of an as yet unreleased full scenario, which includes running light from Haymarket TMD and marshalling the Highland sleeper, however the routing is being unreliable and the signalling buggy, i estimate it could take two days to debug, so I have suspended the project. If this scenario is popular enough and enough people ask for it I will invest the time in completeing the advanced version.
21 Comments
< >
[MO] Martin 28 May, 2016 @ 2:04pm 
Very nice scenario, - thanks !
best regards
htherr 12 Jan, 2015 @ 10:19am 
Very nice run! Thank you very much.
[TFA]Wolf 24 Jul, 2014 @ 2:19pm 
Will do, it is the better loco, it's mind-boggling how RSC could do so much worse.
MaTT  [author] 24 Jul, 2014 @ 5:46am 
Go ahead Wolf ... The original was made with the JT 67, Its a much better drive.
[TFA]Wolf 24 Jul, 2014 @ 3:46am 
Would it cause problems if I used RWTools to replace the RSC Class 67 with the JT one?

It sounds better, looks better, and most importantly drives better.
Strangely enough the JT one feels like it has double the power, and the more precise braking system of both.
modge_92 6 Oct, 2013 @ 11:57am 
Very nice scenario i enjoyed it.
Thank You.
brian62 30 Sep, 2013 @ 4:06pm 
great trip, good AI and signals, minimising problems in scenarios is very
much appreciated by all who are lucky enough to play them. thanks............
Premier Taylerov 16 Sep, 2013 @ 4:41am 
A valid point, and I respect your advice - your scenarios are highly enjoyable and I find them some of the best out there.
MaTT  [author] 13 Sep, 2013 @ 5:00am 
I dont name trains for a reason, a named train would be expected to follow its path to conclusion, It doesnt add to realism because looking at the F9 map is unrealistic ... Trains only need to be on the correct path when they interact with or pass the player, then they must be got rid of as quickly as possible by the shortest possible route, this keeps performace high and minimises the chances of failures from mishandling like saving and resuming or tabbing at signals, Far from understanding what is going on naming trains would confuse matters and open up the scenario to questions like why is the London train heading towards Dundee?
Premier Taylerov 4 Sep, 2013 @ 11:40am 
A thoroughly enjoyable scenario, with interesting AI traffic movements and a realistic timetable. I thought that it could have perhaps been enhanced by naming the AI trains - for me, this adds another level of detail and helps me to understand what's going on (even when the timetable is fictional)! Apart from that, I greatly enjoyed it and recommend it wholeheartedly.