Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
One minor 'mistake', Base of the Boomdakka Snasswagon seems disformed (bigger and rounder).
Still playable though And i thank you for the work you put in this.
Sincerely, A fellow 40K Hobbyist
But If you were to try taking your own pictures and scans I would def suggest taking it at a single angle 360" with atleast 48 pictures. you'll have the best success that way.
additionally agisoft offers a limited time trail for both their versions.
It becomes more important when it comes to more complex shapes like a castellan robot for example. Those are 4 angles x 12 pictures so it becomes alot harder for the software to recognize which angles are where in relation to a 3d model. You'll get a jumble mess if you run the program with just type of particular cases.
the markers basically helps identify the ups/down left and rights of the model so it has a point of reference when scanning.