Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The lower the downforce the higher the ballast. :)
Hope that answers it (ish) for you :)
So the trick is to only add as much ballast you need to the point of the car being loose in the corners then I would look at the suspension to counteract it.
1) I've probably tried every sensible approach. different wing settings + odd ballast so I have seen the difference. and my answer...
Depends on the track ha!
Generally I always run 6-8 ballast as I find ths helps with turn-in but that also means I can run a MUCH lower downforce setup with the right suspension and geometry settings. Wing settings fluctuate between balanced "3-3" or and unbalanced "3-4" for example. Balanced wings I would run on a circuit that had hard breaking zones, more slow corners and not long flowing bends (Canada/Baku). An unbalanced wing setup I would use on tracks that have fast sweeping bends or corners where quick changes of direction are needed (Japan/China).
Yeah I have the same in practice sessions sometimes. It would show me as 17th fastest for instance then I'd qualify in the top 5, just a weird game thing I think that the AI isn't effected by track conditions throughout the weekend until qualifying, fuel is always a factor too.
2- Does running an aggressive rake like in real life work better? (2/5 or 3/6)