13 people found this review helpful
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 11.3 hrs on record
Posted: 8 Dec, 2024 @ 10:29am
Updated: 8 Mar @ 9:35am

Call of Duty® (2003)
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

=== ( 🎯 Difficulty ) ===
☐ No Difficulty
☐ Easy
☑ Standard
☐ Big Learning Curve
☐ Hard
☐ Impossible

=== ( 👪 Audience ) ===
☐ Everyone
☐ Kids
☑ Teens
☑ Adults
☑ Mature

=== ( 👀 Graphics ) ===
☐ What Is This?
☐ Bad
☑ Acceptable
☐ Good
☐ Great
☐ Stylistic
☐ Beautiful
☐ Masterpiece

=== ( Sound/Music ) ===
☐ Bad
☐ Nothing Special
☑ Okay (The explosions were an ear bleed)
☐ Great
☐ Beautiful
☐ I´m Gonna Cry

=== ( 🌏 Story ) ===
☐ This Game Has No Story
☐ Nothing Special
☑ It´s Alright
☐ Well Written
☐ Epic Story
☐ Thinking About It, When I Sleep

=== ( Grinding ) ===
☑ Nothing To Grind
☐ Isn't Necessary To Progress
☐ Average Grind Level
☐ A Lot Of Grinding
☐ You‘ll Need A Second Life For Grinding

=== ( 💎 Price ) ===
☐ Free
☐ Underpriced
☑ Perfect Price
☐ Could Be Cheaper
☐ Overpriced

=== ( ☣ Requirments ) ===
☑ A Toaster Could Run This
☐ Low
☐ Average
☐ Above Average
☐ High End
☐ NASA Computer

=== ( ⏰ Game time/length ) ===
☐ Really short ( 0 - 4 hours)
☑ Short ( 4 - 12 hours)
☐ Average ( 12 - 24 hours)
☐ Long ( 24+ hours)
☐ Multiplayer/Neverending

=== ( 🐞 Bugs ) ===
☐ Game itself is a bug
☐ Lot of bugs
☐ Few Bugs
☑ Nothing

=== ( Controller Support ) ===
☐ Yes
☑ no

=== ( Steam Deck Friendly ) ===
☐ Yes
☑ no

=== ( Enjoyment ) ===
☐ I´d Rather Watch Grass Grow
☐ Hard To Enjoy
☐ Repetitive
☐ It's Okay
☑ Fun To Be Had For Sure
☐ The Kind Of Fun You Will Remember
☐ Life Changing

=== ( Replayability ) ===
☑ One-Time Experience
☐ Only For Achievements
☐ If You Wait A Few Months/Years
☐ Definitely
☐ Infinitely Replayable/Multiplayer

=== ( Worth Playing ) ===
☐ No
☐ Wait For A Sale
☑ Yes
☐ I Can´t Recommend It Enough

TOP FUN THINGS TO DO:
⭐️ Surprisingly realistic (That can't be said for COD anymore).
⭐️ Experiencing an old game.

THE UNIQUES:
💎 The older Call of Duty game can still run pretty smoothly!

PLAYER GAMING REQUIREMENTS:
💼 First Person Shooter.
💼 World War II.
💼 Classic.

PROS:
+ Despite it being the oldest Call of Duty game, it's probably the most satisfying game from the series.

+ It's realistic! None of these stupid skins, it's aimed towards the correct audience and it's a real eye opener to what Activison used to stand for.

+ Such an nostalgic experience! They son't make games like this anymore.

CONS:
- Graphics are very outdated by now..... no fault of the devs though, it is a 2003 game.

- Sound overshadowed the voice acting, couldn't hear a damn thing with all those explosions, I guess it's realistic.

VERDICT:
A lot of you are complaining about the price since it's an old game but I've always gone by the value of the game rather than it's age and personally, I feel like I was undercharged, sure the graphics are.... terrible same can be said with the sounds and such but it still runs smoothly and it's a huge standout from the more modern Call of Duty games.

I'd rather play an outdated game over an unpolished one... it really shows how far the gaming industry has fallen, especially towards these so called AAA games.

Total Score = 87/100.

OVERVIEW:
Call of Duty is a 2003 first-person shooter game developed by Infinity Ward and published by Activision. It is the first installment in the Call of Duty franchise. Much of its theme and gameplay is similar to the Medal of Honor series; however, Call of Duty showcases multiple viewpoints staged in the American, British, and Soviet campaigns of World War II in Europe.

■■■■■■■■□□ 8 / 10
Back when Call of Duty wasn't a joke.

RECOMMENDED SPECS:
It'll run on anything.

Review to Call of Duty 2: https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/profiles/76561198202022263/recommended/2630/
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award