Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
First of all, I still agree. Even early access is an exaggerated start.
1. Dynamics are still not organized.
2. What you can do in the game is limited even for testing.
3. Even simple engines like building castles etc., which is very easy, don't work.
4. A system that is far from reality, such as the capture of other areas, diplomacy, the rebuilding process of the captured areas starting from the beginning and the central administration having no contribution to this, is completely wrong.
5. The game keeps you playing and playing, but eventually you give up because you have to start all over again.
6. They really messed up an otherwise excellent game. It's way, way too early to open early access, and for a fee.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)