16 people found this review helpful
4 people found this review funny
6
Recommended
0.7 hrs last two weeks / 21.7 hrs on record (18.1 hrs at review time)
Posted: 6 Oct, 2024 @ 8:05am

It's okay. It is by no means Game of the Year material like the first one, but it wasn't as bad as people are making it out to be. The story could use some work, sure, but it's otherwise an enjoyable entry to the franchise.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
4 Comments
PiratePlumber 27 Oct, 2024 @ 7:12am 
It seems every positive review makes reference to the negative reviews...
And the majority are negative by far...
I do agree with Optix334 in the fact that we need to stop allowing devs to call games "Fully Released" or "1.0" when there are MANY issues that still plague the game...
This is a hot trend for developers now.
They say 1.0 and then patch and patch and patch....with fix after fix..

And there's a difference in little bugs here and there, small balancing changes..to completely reworking ai...and all the other blatant errors that would prevent a proper 1.0 label...
Optix334 23 Oct, 2024 @ 2:25pm 
You'll always be haunted by the fact that I was Right. Since day 1. Hope it feels good :)
Darth Soban 18 Oct, 2024 @ 12:19pm 
Go away optix, I blocked you for a reason.
Optix334 9 Oct, 2024 @ 12:42pm 
You find the bad ship behaviors, bad balancing, lack of good skirmish AI, inability to keep formations, and all of the other basic RTS usability problems to be Okay?

No wonder every other AAA release is trash. Its amazing what people will ignore.