27 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 7.1 hrs on record
Posted: 16 Nov, 2017 @ 7:11pm
Updated: 16 Nov, 2017 @ 8:09pm

Let me begin by saying that Myst, to this day, is one of my favorite games. I played it the year it came out and it defined me almost as much as it defined the genre of gaming it created. In the following years I played every Myst sequel, read all the books, and bought all the remakes and soundtracks. I preface with this to say, RealMyst: Masterpiece is terrible.

I understand that the first neophyte steps I took onto Myst Island, shrouded in mystery and its share of bewildering puzzles, can never be replicated. Nor has the aesthetic ever been so beautiful as it is in my age-gilded memory. But the graphics in this ‘masterpiece’ are indeed terrible. It’s distractingly terrible. But not nearly so distracting as the nauseating movement, unpredictable controls, and constant crashing (you could blame my computer).

If you have never played the Myst series, then it’s hard to say if you will enjoy this game or not because it really is dated. I’m not sure anyone can have that sense of abandonment that the very first strangers to Myst had because we have now become so used to games dropping us into a situation we have no idea how to handle. But the story behind it all is, even now, unique and beautiful, especially if you continue into the sequels.

I have always enjoyed the puzzles of the Myst series because they feel as though they were built by engineers. They feel practical and organic. They build on the experiences you play through. They make reading the stories and carrying your ‘Myst Notebook’ around with you exciting because you feel like you are studying a new culture and journaling your own progress through a world. In fact, if there was one thing that I think makes the Myst games unique, it is their exploration of culture.

If you could go back in time and play the game in its original form, I would suggest doing that exactly. And then I would give this Masterpiece Edition a huge thumbs down and say, don’t even look at it. But since this ‘Masterpiece’ is the only version you are likely to find, I would still say that the game is worth it. It’s challenging and touching and in truth a (poorly aging) masterpiece.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
14 Comments
Siloam 3 Dec, 2018 @ 2:48pm 
@Cracktus Jack
I realize I'm being confusing in my criticism but I think that's just disappointment speaking. Its kind of the same feeling I had when Lucas update the original Star Wars trilogy. The new stuff is cute, gimmicky, and fun. But it also looks terrible.

If you really want the nostalgia and an as-true-to-the-original as possible playthrough, then I suppose (regular) Myst Masterpiece is good. It has the same look and feel as the original (and the same confusing pic-by-pic movement).

But I really do like the weather and night cycle elements added to the RealMyst versions. And the new age, Rime, is very exciting to see. In principle, I'm not opposed to the RealMyst movement at all. I love the idea. I love that I can walk around in a 3D environment with vegetation and realistic(ish) water animation. I like that it adds details we couldn't see before due to angle and poor resolution. I like the Riven-like addition of animals and the easter eggs from the books….
Siloam 3 Dec, 2018 @ 2:48pm 
…My only criticism is what a terrible job they did of it. The graphics and lighting are just such poor quality. It's better than the original--but barely. If they were going to spend time making yet another version of this game, I wish they had made an effort to crreate something that fits the expectations of this age. Channelwood especially was so, so disappointing because the ambience there (in my memory) is overwhelming, but the visuals in Masterpiece were just tacky.

Even so, I recommend RealMyst Masterpiece. The art and experience is an improvement. It will still feel nostalgic because you are surrounded by the same songs and sounds of the original. I guess my review was just saying that my memory has filled in the graphical holes a lot better than whatever engine they used for this latest version did. So, just keep your expectations low. It won't ruin your memory--just disappoint it.

Sorry for a long reply. I'm apparently more passionate about this game than is healthy.
Cracktus Jack 3 Dec, 2018 @ 10:55am 
Is it the Masterpiece edition you're recommending against, or the RealMyst movement? 'Cause there's also the "regular Myst" Masterpiece Edition that has the exact same movement and control as the original.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/63660

As a nostalgic Myst fan, do you think I'll be happier with regular Myst Materpiece Edition? Or are both Masterpiece Editions nostalgia-ruining versions?
Deisophia 7 Oct, 2018 @ 11:32am 
Absolutely enjoyed this review, it was personal and yet explored the position that Myst holds as the prototype for the modern walking simulator games today.
Cyrus 8 Feb, 2018 @ 11:16am 
Rose
Tinted
uzernaem 16 Jan, 2018 @ 10:52am 
Okay, thanks for the answer!
Siloam 16 Jan, 2018 @ 10:48am 
I can't claim to know their original intent, but I do know that having to compress the graphics so it would all fit onto one CD was limiting. But do what you want. If you want to experience history, then I suppose the original is the way to go. I just think you may have some trouble getting it to run, and it's impossible to regain the initial intent of Myst because our current environment has changed so much. It's like showing A New Hope to someone who's never seen Star Wars; it's not nearly as impressive as it was when it first game out due to the novelty of it.
uzernaem 16 Jan, 2018 @ 8:15am 
Old graphics don't really bother me. I play many old stuff in DOSBox. I just want to start with "the essential" version of Myst, the one that's true to what the developers originally intended. Can this be said about Masterpiece edition?
Siloam 15 Jan, 2018 @ 11:22am 
You're propably asking the Bunny, but I would think that if you're planning to play, you'd probably be better off playing the Masterpiece version. I imagine it would be difficult to play such an old game in its originial format with no support. And the Masterpiece version does have much better graphics and some new content (like free movement, weather, animals, and a new world)--so it's a little more moody and immersive in general. I do say the graphics are bad, but that's in comparison to current technology. Compared to the originial game, they're much improved.

http://www.mystfanart.org/myst-comparisons.jpg
uzernaem 15 Jan, 2018 @ 11:12am 
Hey dude. Would you recommend original MAC version over Windows 3.1 one, or Windows one is good enough?