26 people found this review helpful
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 6.8 hrs on record
Posted: 18 Nov, 2017 @ 12:41am
Updated: 18 Nov, 2017 @ 12:43am

Really wanted this to not be like previous iterations where it's beyond ridiculous, but there's just nothing of value here.

In 2017, we still have to deal with matchmaking for games, no server browser, terrible netcode and unbalanced weapons. Loads of cheaters and heaps of mid-20's males acting like children.

There is no hope for Call of Duty. The game needs a new formula because this hasn't worked for years.

As for the single player, while I liked the story, the game was way too short. Call of Duty used to be known for these epic single player stories that were really good then right out of nowhere, you're kicked in the balls and the feels train is running full steam. WW2's single player was nothing like that. There was no memorable moments or points where you felt really ♥♥♥♥♥♥ about the situation. There's a part of the story where it explains a situation during a different battle where a bunch of soldiers are killed because the CO didn't want to leave them behind. It would have been amazing to be able to have that as a level, not just some passing thing.

So many missed opportunities to have this as such a refreshing game, but it's just the same old, reskinned. Again.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award