418 people found this review helpful
22 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 0.1 hrs on record
Posted: 27 Jul, 2015 @ 12:58pm
Updated: 20 Jan, 2016 @ 6:13am

Disclaimer
This "review" is meant to be a blemish of Warner Brothers publisher for what they've released on PC on June 23, 2015. Negative words about the game mean technical state of PC version of Batman: Arkham Knight at the moment of the launch. All the information I refer to can be easily checked on the internet, I give almost no references here.

What Happened?
I'm sure I can not write what happen at the launch of Batman AK on PC. In a nutshell: crashes, stuttering and terrible performance issues overall (even on the best systems, on both AMD and Nvidia setups), 30 FPS cap, texture and visual effects issues and so on. Of course, it was reflected in tons of negative feedback from community and press. Steam Store had superior percentage of negative reviews. The game was pulled from sale on Steam which never ever happened before as far as I know. Users were offered to refund the game and Green Man Gaming (games online store) even started refunds for BAK though they don't do it on regular basis as it's stated in their Terms and Conditions and Refund Policy.

Who to Blame?
Much sh*t was poured on Rocksteady (BAK developers) and on "external PC development partner" Iron Galaxy Studios (studio that ported the game to PC). It's clear that the first were responsible for the game in general and console versions of it in particular and Rocksteady did its job quite good as far as I'm concerned. IGS is made guilty more often (they were doing PC version of the game, at least), but I refuse to do so. They're experienced[en.wikipedia.org] enough in developing, porting and assisting in porting games for various platforms. They ported Bioshock: Infinite to PC and The Handsome Collection (Borderlands 2 and Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel) to PS4 and XBox One after all. I wouldn't judge them unless I knew the conditions they were set and time they were given to do their job.

But I know who to blame for sure - Batman Arkham Knight publisher Warner Bros.

Quick Facts
  • WB made decision to have console versions of the game as primary ones (which is, sadly, a common practice nowadays) and to outsource porting to PC. It didn't happen to previous Batman games made by Rocksteady. Quite likely this decision was made just to save money on PC version because sales on PC are lower comparing to consoles.
  • WB didn't give much sh*t about testing the game on PC. Anonymous sources say PC version of BAK was tested by 10% of sources (while PC is more complex than consoles) and in 720p. Standard resolution for PC gamers, right?
  • WB took decision to protect their crap that can't hold even 30 FPS with Denuvo[en.wikipedia.org] anti-tamper technology. No comments.
  • WB as a publisher is responsible for what they ship to customers. They decide when it's ready for release. They can delay the release (like it happened to GTA V PC or Witcher 3). And they knew the crap they had been releasing on PC. Undoubtedly. But they still did it. Shameless wankers.
  • WB f*cked up MK X launch as well. And its PC Version was also outsourced. What a coincidence, right?

Final Words
Warner Bros. made the ultimate slap to all PC gamers' faces and showed their attitude to us. I suggest you to pay them the same coin and blacklist them as a publisher. And you should definitely refund the game (if you haven't done it before). Have done it right after finished writing this.

As P.S. I will leave this TotalBiscuit's video about why you should never pre-order games:
http://youtu.be/mf5Uj4XIT1Y
Thanks for reading my "review". Cheers!
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
21 Comments
murla 20 Jan, 2016 @ 6:14am 
Thanks! I don't write reviews regularly but I put my efforts to write this one.
QuantizedAnson 20 Jan, 2016 @ 4:40am 
This is the BEST review I can see so far in the page.
Kaizo 12 Jan, 2016 @ 5:23pm 
Right, i think i forgot to say that not all of them are bad, ESPECIALLY UT1, 2, 3, 4. Basically cause they are made by epic games.
murla 12 Jan, 2016 @ 3:09pm 
Well, I can't say I noticed that. Even vice versa, I can recall such superb UE games like Mass Effect (the whole series), Mirror's Edge, Enslaved: Odyssey to the West that had good PC versions. It's not engine to blame but money-driven assholes for s**tty PC ports of UE-based games.
Kaizo 12 Jan, 2016 @ 1:06pm 
have you noticed that so many unreal engine games, have horrible PC versions? I played arkham asylum on ps4, and it was great, but stayed at 30fps. Sony and Microsoft pay the developers of the game extra, to make sure it runs just fine on their consoles. WB does a bad job at making good PC launches. Sometimes they make up for it, and many times, they dont (mkx.) But im really glad i got it on ps4. i also have mkx on ps4, and pc. PS4 RUNS AT 60fps XD
murla 21 Aug, 2015 @ 1:17am 
BAK was 4 years in development on 5-9 years old engine and WB released such crap on PC. Give me a break.
Also there is a disclaimer that explains what kind of review it is.
frog 20 Aug, 2015 @ 3:33pm 
you have .01 hours gameplay and you're leaving a book size review. Give me a break
600piecesof8 6 Aug, 2015 @ 8:15am 
"There are already fucking reviews like this, we don't need or want any more of them." Bizarre statement @TomofBlades. Are you with the marketing team of WB?
murla 31 Jul, 2015 @ 6:00am 
I've watched and shared this hilarious video shortly after it popped up, but thanks anyway.