2 people found this review helpful
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 41.1 hrs on record (33.2 hrs at review time)
Posted: 26 Nov, 2018 @ 1:38am
Updated: 16 Jun, 2019 @ 5:22am

Early Access Review
Edit after the 0.6 patch:

After the most recent patch the game finally performs acceptably in both Warzone (avg. 60-80 FPS) and TDM (avg. 80-100+ FPS) for me. In terms of content, the devs have added quite a few new weapons as well as new maps to the game which is always great to see. The new Recon game mode seems to be on the horizon too. Overall, the game seems to be moving in the right direction and also regaining some of the playerbase that was lost after the disappointing launch. If the developers keep this up, then we will have a content-rich and polished product by the time it releases from Early Access. This is why I'm changing my review to positive.

Original negative review:

Gameplay wise this game is pretty good: the damage model and the gunplay are definitely its strong points.
However, this is where pretty much all the positives end for this game. The optimization is still far from great, even after quite a few patches and fixes, keeping in mind that the average player will have to turn them to low for a tolerable performance. The biggest issue the game's currently facing - very low player count with the 24hr peak usually reaching just above 100 players.
Even though I want to like and recommend this game, in its current state it's just impossible.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award