ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
▄█▄ █▀█▀█ ▄█▄
▀▀████▄█▄████▀▀
▀█▀█▀
𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒃𝒂𝒕𝒇𝒖𝒍 𝒅𝒂𝒚
What he means is that since the regime's is wrong and bad, then he always receives their work negatively. Similarly, EA has a very bad image as well, so he took their work as TP. Although, these 2 ideas are in 2 very different categories, but the situational example stands. "Ill intent giants = permanent negative perception"
I personally believe that the art may be diff. from the artist. EA may have ruined many franchises (which I adored), hyped up nothing-burgers, and been fueled by greed since the rise of the new gen of games. However, I believe that they can still make a good game. They can, but will they? Only time can tell.
As for the spyware/anti-cheat, you can't blame people for standing against it, while still being playing those games. It is an enforced measure, and you must either bite the bullet to play the game, or completely ditch it.
One of the most notorious examples are Valorant. Many people including myself decided to uninstall the game thanks to the constantly-running-China-issued-suspicious-detection-system software, aka an obvious spyware. Some people decided accepted the fact their info is out there anyway, and might as well be sold for surveys. As long as they can play their favorite game and not be affected negatively, they won't mind.
God Bless