Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
WM
Furthermore, I'm PERSONALLY looking forwards to this game continuing to develop and am more than willing to change my reccomendation status if it does progress.
I don't know what else you want from a review honestly. Plenty of reviews are just like "ths game sux dont by it" type of trash that come with a 'not recommended' tag. If you look at my written reviews I've reviewed plenty of early access reviews, but as I said in my review here for this game if "you want to support the developers, go ahead and grab it."
But the game is, in my opinion, unfinished and so early in it's development that the vast majority of players won't get much if anything out of it.
@BlueDragon922 that was a good one cx
Co-op vs bots is next, along with survivor mode, then a Quality of life pass, and the Single player campaign - as a small team, doing it with the fans it just takes a bit of time.
Thanks for your patience.
WM