Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
atus has to be advanced that appeals to our intuitions and instincts,
to our values and our desires, as well as to the possibilities inherent
in the social world we inhabit. If successful, this conceptual appar-
atus becomes so embedded in common sense as to be taken for
granted and not open to question. The founding figures of neolib-
eral thought took political ideals of human dignity and individual
freedom as fundamental, as ‘the central values of civilization’. In so
doing they chose wisely, for these are indeed compelling and
seductive ideals. These values, they held, were threatened not only
by fascism, dictatorships, and communism, but by all forms of
state intervention that substituted collective judgements for those
of individuals free to choose