安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
but it was weird af. it could have been coincidence but i honestly feel like it was the comment that made me fart.
there's no smell either which is a disappointment but hopefully another one will come soon so i can plug my bum hole with my finger during the flatulence and get a good whiff of something nice.
William T. Rowe describes the decline of the Qing as "a perfect storm of three simultaneous problems: the external shock of the expanding West, a secular crisis caused by an accumulation of socioeconomic difficulties over the long term and more acute political dysfunctions associated with the familiar pattern of the dynastic cycle." As someone else suggested, Kenneth Pomeranz Great Divergance is critical in understanding this topic. Instead of viewing China as falling behind the Europeans, it is important to understand that the European experience was very much outside of the norms of economic and technological advance. China continued to advance at a normal rate, while Europe leaped forward. I would argue that this was mostly due to their colonization of other countries and lands, but that is up for debate among scholars.