Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
but it was weird af. it could have been coincidence but i honestly feel like it was the comment that made me fart.
there's no smell either which is a disappointment but hopefully another one will come soon so i can plug my bum hole with my finger during the flatulence and get a good whiff of something nice.
William T. Rowe describes the decline of the Qing as "a perfect storm of three simultaneous problems: the external shock of the expanding West, a secular crisis caused by an accumulation of socioeconomic difficulties over the long term and more acute political dysfunctions associated with the familiar pattern of the dynastic cycle." As someone else suggested, Kenneth Pomeranz Great Divergance is critical in understanding this topic. Instead of viewing China as falling behind the Europeans, it is important to understand that the European experience was very much outside of the norms of economic and technological advance. China continued to advance at a normal rate, while Europe leaped forward. I would argue that this was mostly due to their colonization of other countries and lands, but that is up for debate among scholars.