It's a game that is bad at where it's supposed to be good at and decent at the rest of the other thing.

Straight to the point, as an RTS game, this game is bad. Compared to MoW:AS2, it lack features that i think make that game amazing.

- You can't place vehicle facing exactly where you wanted it to be.
- AI is quite dumb, including your controlled unit AI, with them not automatically try to go somewhere where they can shoot their given target but instead standing around like an absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ while aiming at the enemy location if something is blocking on their way / line of sight (aka you need to manually move each and every single unit to a good spot in order for them to fire)
- Campaign while not as linear as MoW:AS2, are sometimes garbage. One example is that one time where you are tasked to capture a location and only given 1 AT unit + some other non AT and later on if you lost that 1 unit, there's no way for you to destroy enemy armored and thus making you stuck or failing the scenario.
- Lack content.

However, i will give credit when credit is due. The FPS aspect of it is actually the better among the dev's other titles. It felt nice and doesn't feel as clunky like in MoW:AS2 and passable as like an old school shooter. And the multiplayer is actually pretty decent since in here at least you don't need to deal with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ campaign scenarios / AI as much.

So yeah. For me, as an RTS game that i played mostly solo-coop, this game is definitely a down grade from MoW:AS2 and i wouldn't recommend it. But if you care only for the multiplayer pvp aspect of it, maybe you can give it a try.

It's a game that is bad at where it's supposed to be good at and decent at the rest of the other thing. Straight to the point, as an RTS game, this game is bad. Compared to MoW:AS2, it lack features that i think make that game amazing. - You can't place vehicle facing exactly where you wanted it to be. - AI is quite dumb, including your controlled unit AI, with them not automatically try to go somewhere where they can shoot their given target but instead standing around like an absolute dipshit while aiming at the enemy location if something is blocking on their way / line of sight (aka you need to manually move each and every single unit to a good spot in order for them to fire) - Campaign while not as linear as MoW:AS2, are sometimes garbage. One example is that one time where you are tasked to capture a location and only given 1 AT unit + some other non AT and later on if you lost that 1 unit, there's no way for you to destroy enemy armored and thus making you stuck or failing the scenario. - Lack content. However, i will give credit when credit is due. The FPS aspect of it is actually the better among the dev's other titles. It felt nice and doesn't feel as clunky like in MoW:AS2 and passable as like an old school shooter. And the multiplayer is actually pretty decent since in here at least you don't need to deal with shitty campaign scenarios / AI as much. So yeah. For me, as an RTS game that i played mostly solo-coop, this game is definitely a down grade from MoW:AS2 and i wouldn't recommend it. But if you care only for the multiplayer pvp aspect of it, maybe you can give it a try.