Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The modelling states the construction bill will be repaid over 50 years, starting by 2037, which means nearly four decades of repayments are excluded from its total bill.
The opposition's modelling compares apples with oranges. It outlines a plan to build an electricity grid 45 per cent smaller than the government, and claims a win by stating its plan is 44 per cent cheaper.
The opposition's plan states it would halt private investment in renewables by 2026 and replace it with up to tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer-funded nuclear plants.
Also it won't be available for 25 years. Whose ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rice are you gonna buy?