this seems like nothing compared to ck2 dlc though. DLc cost 200 pounds all together. the developers of ck2 have even worse attitude to dlc

I believe the game is more then half finished, it's still the point that if I had to bet I'd say the game was released by CA/SEGA with the intention to release all these overpriced (I think a more reasonable price would've been $10 or $15 max, not worth $20 imo) faction DLCs at a later date while still keeping the base game price at 60$. Overall I think the game is very good, only disappointed with how they went about treating DLCs for the game. Other than that the game is a +

While i do not agree with it being half finished, i atleast can understand that kind of perspective.

The reason the base game gets a negative review for bad/overpriced DLC is because unless you put tons of money into the DLC being pumped out, the base game is essentially just an unfinished game you're playing.

What about reviewing the dlc you don't like instead of negatively affecting the base game? You must know that the more popular a game is the more likely it is to keep being supported, right?

70$ for 4 races plus 8 dollars for another race on the same day the game comes out!!?!?! Get fucked.

Why give the GAME a bad review?

wait, rome 2 had a bunch of DLC, that you had to pay for, and everyone thought it was the greatest thing sence sliced bread, whats the issue now?

Then not recommend the dlc packs then not main game.

Also hard to recommend the game because it's simply not a great total war game.