I played WT since 2014-and tank battles were astoundingly ♥♥♥♥ in those days- then stopped for a year because I felt the game itself was not even well-developed. However, I came back to WT in early months of 2016. I had to change my mind on WT; I was mad at WoT starting to throw a party with prototypes n' vehicles only existed on blueprints. By the way, I can tell this boring story all the day but I won't. Let's get some review.
Since WoT and WT has their different inclination and aim for their gamers, I will not make a comparison review.

• War Thunder is a unique game you might have different feelings from WoT and WoWS. From the game system itself to the gameplay experiences. And so far, WT has no competitors in its genre. If you should talk about Armored Warfare, WT will take advantage of all games despite the fact that AW has died or not even exist to compete with.Weebs, Hipsters, Meme loving nerds, Military veterans could enjoy this game.
  
• Die-hard action gamers would be satisfied with historical accuracies and amounts of researchable vehicles.
  
• And now, even Cold War is about to happen in this game.
  
• WT's integration of Air-Land battle (and so Naval warfare will.) is not the usual thing on the similar genre games. Battlefield? Well, BF has infantry. This one has no infantries but much more planes and tanks to fight.

And I would say War Thunder has tons of ♥♥♥♥♥ to review on. I recommend this game, but I can't get the points for recommending to.

• As I mentioned above, I was mad at WoT adding non-existed tanks. War Thunder might follow their path in my opinion.
  
• Die-hard action gamers are the severe problem when it comes to Rank-to-Rank. Imagine if you have a plane at rank II with 2.7 battle rank. But you might have to deal with those high wankers rankers to gain your research points. It gets worse by ranks. Especially the realistic battle.
  
• Cold War era tanks could be pointed at the game's actual reason of harsh criticizing. Devs didn't categorize tanks from era to era. As an example: If you have Maus, the opposite will bring rockets and even ATGM missiles.
  
• Golden Eagles required if you would like to unlock new vehicles faster. And some things called "Premium Vehicles" usually take the advantage. You will find yourself looking for a credit card to buy a tank.

If you are strongly into Military warfare games, I recommend it. If you are not, stop playing WT at 3rd rank.

[h1]This game is commie-biased a lot, and some might like it. While most players wouldn't.[/h1] I played WT since 2014-and tank battles were [u]astoundingly[/u] shit in those days- then stopped for a year because I felt the game itself was not even well-developed. However, I came back to WT in early months of 2016. I had to change my mind on WT; I was mad at WoT starting to throw a party with prototypes n' vehicles only existed on blueprints. [strike]By the way, I can tell this boring story all the day but I won't.[/strike] Let's get some review. [u]Since WoT and WT has their different inclination and aim for their gamers, I will not make a comparison review.[/u] [h1]Pros[/h1] [list] [*]War Thunder is a unique game you might have different feelings from WoT and WoWS. From the game system itself to the gameplay experiences. And so far, WT has no competitors in its genre. [spoiler]If you should talk about Armored Warfare, WT will take advantage of all games despite the fact that AW has died or not even exist to compete with.[/spoiler]Weebs, Hipsters, Meme loving nerds, Military veterans could enjoy this game. [*]Die-hard action gamers would be satisfied with historical accuracies and amounts of researchable vehicles. [*]And now, even Cold War is about to happen in this game. [*]WT's integration of Air-Land battle (and so Naval warfare will.) is not the usual thing on the similar genre games. Battlefield? Well, BF has infantry. This one has no infantries but much more planes and tanks to fight. [/list] And I would say War Thunder has tons of shits to review on. I recommend this game, but I can't get the points for recommending to. [h1]Cons[/h1] [list] [*]As I mentioned above, I was mad at WoT adding non-existed tanks. War Thunder might follow their path in my opinion. [*]Die-hard action gamers are the severe problem when it comes to Rank-to-Rank. Imagine if you have a plane at rank II with 2.7 battle rank. But you might have to deal with those high [strike]wankers[/strike] rankers to gain your research points. It gets worse by ranks. Especially the realistic battle. [*]Cold War era tanks could be pointed at the game's actual reason of harsh criticizing. Devs didn't categorize tanks from era to era. As an example: If you have Maus, the opposite will bring rockets and even ATGM missiles. [*]Golden Eagles required if you would like to unlock new vehicles faster. And some things called "Premium Vehicles" usually take the advantage. You will find yourself looking for a credit card to buy a tank. [/list] [b]If you are strongly into Military warfare games, I recommend it. If you are not, stop playing WT at 3rd rank.[/b]