I am a professional biologist, forklift driver, zealous drinker and an avid erudite scholar, who despises what is currently happening to our culture and history.

From video games, to television, to movies, our culture is becoming irreversibly ruined, marred beyond recognition, until the new generation is deceived into earnestly believing that the staples of diversity and sexual perversion have been a norm for aeons, as opposed to mainly the last 50 years.

It began subtly, adding a few blacks and queers here and there, surreptitiously engineering the populace into believing that it was norm, or at the very least that it wasn't egregious to add a single black into a western, medieval environment. Then 2016 struck, and the veil was finally lifted. Every single aspect of our culture, from our religion to our ethnicity was a point of contention.

Our entertainment based upon 'historical accuracy' was besmirched. They made various members of the European nobility dark skinned, dubbed our mythology as 'racially salient' and lambasted any who disagreed with their callous disregard for history as a 'racist', or some form of uncultured swine.

Occasionally they have committed such slights against European culture under the guise of rationality, other times they had a flagrant disregard for our criticisms, and sneered as they dangled the keys of extinction afore our very eyes.

If you don't believe me, then look at it thus far. Just from memory, I can recall them altering the pigment of Snow White, Ariel, Heimdall and various others, including arbitrarily adding blacks into the Frozen lore, which is founded upon the basis of Norwegian mythology. Now before all decry that what I've mentioned are 'myths', that argument is irrelevant, for myths convey our culture, our history and have the potential to spur our people into action. Just espy the significance that the Asatru theistic sect bore in the Scandinavian region. Religion and mythology give an insight upon the people's beliefs at the time, what they revered and what they detested, the followers appearance and their perceptions of the world.

Preemptively, for all of those contemplating as to how a religion insinuates a specific race of people, then ponder the idea that religious figures depict the aesthetic of its followers. Simply, people want to worship deities that personify them. As an example, Jesus is regarded as dark skinned in African communities, whilst for Europeans he is regarded as white. The same goes for any other region. The Hellenic Greeks regarded their deities, such as Zeus, Poseidon, Athena, alongside their heroes such as Achilles, as flaxen haired and bright eyed, for they themselves fit that description. The same extends to the Ancient Egyptians.

To be candid, I am sick of the teeming masses asserting that Egyptians back in the ages of the Pharoah's were not white, because spoiler alert, they were. Alexander the Great was blonde and blue eyed, conquered a large portion of the world, including Egypt, and after his death the empire split into factions led by his generals, who shared a similar phenotype. For Egypt in particular, the upper nobility, craftsmen and military was dominated by Alexander The Greats soldiers, military men and generals, who to reiterate, were white. If you don't believe me on the physiognomy of the Pharaoh's, then simply observe the aesthetic of their sarcophagus' once buried. It is a common fact that Pharaoh's, when mummified were designed to emulate the Pharaoh's aesthetic, as they believed it would keep their body intact, once transported to the afterlife. That means the eyes, eyebrows, hair, etc, is designed to be as ACCURATE as possible. That leads onto my next point.

You ever notice how the sarcophagus' have sapphires or lapis lazuli for eyes, and prominent European features? Well that's because they were European, denoting that they are white. CASE RESOLVED.

Same with Hannibal, and those residing in Northern Africa. Northern African's even today aren't the stygian pigmented 'people' that reside in central and southern Africa, no, instead they are called Berbers. Berbers being WHITE. Take Hannibal for instance. Hannibal is arguably the most renowned war general of the region. He led Carthage against the Roman empire, sent elephants into battle, then met his demise after being defeated by the Romans, who won solely because they used Germanic mercenaries and Northern Europeans of superior blood (A battle is often determined by which side has the more Nordic phenotype). Hannibal is often depicted as dark skinned, bulbous nosed and probably wearing an Afro if you are a simpleton. In reality, if you envision his marble bust, located in Capua, Italy, it can easily be discerned that his facial features bewray wholly white genes.

Soon we had fiends proclaiming that blacks existed and settled in Britain prior to the 1950's, and that's where the genuine predicament began.

But before I go on, remember what they've done.

LORD OF THE RINGS/MIDDLE EARTH LORE - They made Elves black, despite the clear indication that they were fair skinned, meaning of a white pigment.

DRAGON AGE SERIES/ASSASSINS CREED VALHALLA/MORDHAU/ANYTHING ELSE MEDIEVAL WITH BLACKS AND QUEERS IN IT - Arbitrarily added blacks, despite the fact that in regards to naming conventions, armour, architecture and mythology, it was all derived from Europe, specifically during the medieval era.

Do you notice how every aspect of a medieval game is authentic, except for when it comes to social issues. This is because they are attempting to blackwash our history, to impugn all we hold dear and to make sure that Europeans are culturally scattered like the Lost Tribes Of Israel. But Ill tell you what, I won't forgive them, ill never forget what they have done. Every slight, every infraction, I will record in the book of grudges, and then when the day of revelation emerges they will repent for every attempt they have had to extinguish the flames of my race.

When the pendulum swings the other way, your time will come.

Initially they began by attacking our weakest points. Many in the modern day could simply be shown the average person of Greece, Northern Africa, Egypt or the Middle East and be convinced that in the days of yore they appeared relatively swarthy, but now they attack our strongest, most safeguarded cultures.

They mercilessly hound us on topics of Northern Europe, claiming that Vikings could be black, that queers and other freaks were prolific, and that blacks were prominent in Britain during the 19th century. I reached this epiphany after concocting a Hogwarts Legacy discussion post, courteously requesting that they remove blacks and queers from the environment, as it was not historically accurate.

Immediately I was harassed, I had wretched fiends hurling debris through my windows, exclaiming the identical insults, jeers and 'counter arguments', yet it was to no avail, for soon I swathed in a mound of Steam awards which I have no use for, and flourished. But it got me thinking.

Firstly, and I know it doesn't matter, but Harry Potter's world directly coincides with the real world, to the extent that the wizards directly influence real life politics. Furthermore, only people with magical talent , who reside in Britain and Ireland are permitted into Hogwarts, meaning that the artificial addition of blacks and queers in such propensity is not only forced, but disingenuous to the lore.

Now for those of you who are mentally handicapped, I would like to reiterate that I am referring to Britain and Ireland, which is officially deemed as the United Kingdom, and by no means am I referring to the Commonwealth, or British Empire, which would encompass countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and everything else that the Anglo has conquered.

In 1950 Britain, it was estimated there were no more than 20,000 non-White residents in the United Kingdom, mainly in England; with almost all born overseas. This is 20,000 out of 50 million people, a figure that stands at less than a percent. Now, given that since the 1950's immigration has increased, along with the non white population in Europe, it can be safely ascertained that the non white population in the UK was virtually non existent prior to 1950. This is especially the case for Wales and Scotland.

Now before anyone comes in and goes, "BBBBBUT, LOOK AT THIS SOURCE, IT SAYS THAT THIS AFRICAN WAS BOUGHT INTO BRITAIN DURING X DATE!" You're probably not wrong, but it doesn't mean anything. The fact that people make a big deal out of a handful of non white people existing in Britain prior to the 20th century proves my point, it shows that they were a rarity, hence the undue attention they receive. Furthermore, it is likely that these Africans visited from Commonwealth regions and didn't stay permanently, for if they remained in Britain, then it would be likely for them to settle, have kids, who then had kids and so forth. However, that didn't occur, for if it did, you'd see an indication of black communities, which only sprung up in the UK during the 60's and 70's. Alongside this the non white population in the 1950's would've been more than 20,000. So no, it's likely there were some, but undoubtedly they didn't reside permanently and instead went back to where they came from.

Y'know, it's like having a blue apple right. Imagine if a bunch of sots started arguing with you that apples could be blue, and that's why every advert about Granny Smiths apples HAD to include a blue one. Then when you told them to shove it, they responded by saying, "WHAT DO YOU MEAN BLUE APPLES AREN'T A THING? LOOK AT THIS LINK, SEE THIS BLUE APPLE! THIS MEANS WE NEED TO PUT THEM IN EVERY ADVERT AND TEACH OUR YOUNG THAT APPLES CAN BE BLUE!"

You see, most people would realise that this person is a maniac, and that a blue apple is an exception, just like how a non white in Britain, or hell, anywhere in Northern Europe, would be, prior to the 20th century. But people nowaday's appear unable to decipher that exceptions PROVE the rule. A blue apple is a mutation, an anomaly, and by being an anomaly proves that apples are green and red. So think of it like this. There might be one or two black figures in Britain before the 20th century, but they are an exception, and wouldn't even constitute a percent of the population.

Another analogy in mind. William Adams was one of the only European Samurai in Japan. Despite a solitary instance of a European Samurai, everyone would have a problem (And rightfully so) if a game about Japan during the 17th century was brimming with blonde, blue eyed Europeans. You couldn't just waive away the criticism by saying, "Wwwweeelllllll, it says here that William Adams was a samurai, so it is plausible'. Frankly, no, it isn't. It would be a mockery of another races culture and history.

The same goes for freaks. Gays even in the mid 20th century were driven underground, executed, placed in mental wards where they belong and were by no means a norm. Having a game set in a historical environment would do well to either not include them, or not act as though people back then were accepting of decadence and debauchery, because unlike modern day values, they were not.

The same goes with transgenders. I know you can claim it's existed since 'AGES BRO', but that doesn't cut it. They had no hormonal treatment back then, no surgeries that permitted the mentally ill to polymorph into another sex, and frankly it didn't exist. While I could be inclined to believe that people back then, in sparse numbers cross dressed, that isn't the same thing. Furthermore, I've heard the argument that mythology depicted transgenders, thus it was widely known. The most common evidence for this seems to be mythological figures such as Loki, who was known for morphing into a woman and giving birth to several eldritch abominations. This doesn't indicate that Loki was transgender, because for all intents and purposes he was able to give birth, which is something no transgender will ever be able to do. He didn't adopt his children, nor did he hype himself up on dubious hormones, instead he became an actual woman, which again, is something no male to female individual can be. To reiterate, Loki wasn't a transgender, because he turned into a genuine female that was able to give birth, whereas the modern day equivalent cannot do that.

Overall, I could go on about this for days on end, and I would very much like to, but alas the text limit confounds my attempts. Thus, I am offering an invitation to anyone interested in conversing with I, and learning the truth about this world, alongside the insidious attempts to distort and warp our perception of history. Below is my Discord, I look forward to greeting and teaching any who wish to know the truth.

Kraft Singles In Your Area#9135