Holopscion
United States
Sedang Online
Aktivitas Terkini
Tercatat 14.270 jam
terakhir dimainkan pada 9 Agu
Progres Pencapaian   120 dari 156
Tercatat 490 jam
terakhir dimainkan pada 9 Agu
Tercatat 38 jam
terakhir dimainkan pada 8 Agu
Komentar
andrew 6 Feb 2018 @ 1:51pm 
Ok, so like imagine this chick; but she's this totally ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ SMOKING hot chick, and she's got really ♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and a ♥♥♥♥ butthole that you can pound and a ♥♥♥♥ little feminine ♥♥♥♥♥ you can stroke and ♥♥♥♥. Did that feel ♥♥♥? I thought not. We have used both of the types of thinking to solve the mystery of if traps are ♥♥♥. They are not. I have used indisputable science techniques to skip the hypothesis completely and go straight to a proof. Science thinking is a secret third type of thinking that many people don't have so this may be a difficult concept to grasp for some. I am happy to explain my theorem further and am opening this thread to discussion.
andrew 6 Feb 2018 @ 1:51pm 
Traps are NOT ♥♥♥ and I am here to prove it. Let's start with logic thinking. We will apply these questions to a trap, and it will help determine if they are ♥♥♥. Does the person have a masculine ♥♥♥♥♥? No, they have a feminine ♥♥♥♥♥. Is the person a man? No, they are called dickgirls for a reason. Does a man have a numerical value of 1? No, not only is that not the case, but a man (or a woman) has no numerical value. This is nonsense. Is it ♥♥♥ to be ♥♥♥♥♥♥ by a girl? No, if this was the case then all heterosexual ♥♥♥ would in fact be homosexual in nature. Suffice to say, I think we can all agree that traps are not ♥♥♥ using quick and easy logic thinking. Now, we will use imagination thinking to imagine a situation in which you are having ♥♥♥♥♥♥ intercourse with a trap.