9 people found this review helpful
2 people found this review funny
2
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 2.1 hrs on record (2.0 hrs at review time)
Posted: 17 Jun, 2022 @ 9:03am

(本评论自带中英文双语版)(This review comes with a bilingual version in both Chinese and English)
最终幻想7,无数人经典的回忆,如果从来没有接触过最终幻想系列,那我首先推荐第七部,还建议补一补电影。不管是蒂法、爱丽丝,还是克劳德,扎克斯,萨菲罗斯,都给人留下了十分深刻的印象。如果没玩过最终幻想7,那真是人生的一大遗憾。

借此无限怀念来自CS起源和CSGO的僵尸逃跑神图ze_ffvii_mako_reactor_v5_3.

此外,批评SE和EPIC的独占决策。首先声明,我只是消费者,不是什么信仰铁粉。
良好的市场竞争应该是商品都放出来,几家平台通过竞争不断提高服务质量,共同进步,从而形成一个良性循环,打造一个买方和卖方双赢的局面。而不是搞垄断搞独占,强迫消费者为了某件商品就必须去特定的商店购买。
我不是什么市场营销专家,但一边投入大量的资金买游戏送消费者发糖提升路人缘,一方面又搞独占拿着大棒强迫消费者选择败光路人缘,这种矛盾的运营方式换个普通人都觉得很奇怪。何况,大笔的资金都花去买游戏送的宣传费用,那作为游戏平台最核心的竞争力——服务质量还能跟上不?服务质量跟不上,消费者就不买账,不买账就没有盈利,没有盈利就不能继续买游戏送玩家,那这样拿到手的免费游戏能否保值?
这值得深思。我宁肯在steam上购买,因为从目前来看保值,目前我不用担心买了FF7哪天突然没了又要重新花钱。而且创意工坊可以等各种MOD,服务器多下载速度不卡,不容易掉线,好友经常在线可以交流,以及有steam特色的成就系统我很喜欢。
总之,服务质量做好了,自然有人买账,其他的动作都是扯淡,作为消费者,谁家服务质量好我就去哪家。

Final Fantasy VII, as for a classic game, had many memories of countless people,.If you have never come into contact with the Final Fantasy series, I'll recommend the seventh firstly, so do the movie. Whether it is Tifa, Alice, or Claude, Zack, Sephiroth, they all left a very deep impression on people. What a great regrets if there has never been played FF VII!

Take this chance, I'll miss the Zombie Escape map that ze_FFVI_Mako_Reactor_V5_3 from CS:Source and CSGO forever.

On the other hand, I'll criticize monopoly decisions from se and EGS. First of all, I'm just a consumer, not a fan of faith.
Good market competition should be when all products are released, and several platforms continue to improve service quality through competition and make progress together, thus forming a virtuous circle and creating a win-win situation for buyers and sellers. Rather than engage in monopoly and monopoly, forcing consumers to go to a specific store to buy a certain product.
I'm not a marketing expert, but while investing a lot of money to buy games and send consumers to increase popularity, on the other hand, I engage in monopoly and hold big sticks to force consumers to choose to lose popularity. This kind of contradictory operation method is strange to ordinary people. All feel weird. What's more, a large amount of money is spent on the promotion costs of the game, so as the core competitiveness of the game platform - can the service quality keep up? If the service quality can’t keep up, consumers will not buy it, and if they don’t buy it, there will be no profit. If there is no profit, they cannot continue to buy games and give players away. Can the free games they get in this way preserve their value?
It's worth thinking about. I would rather buy it on steam, because from the current point of view, I don't have to worry about buying FF7 and it suddenly disappears and has to spend money again. In addition, the creative workshop can wait for various MODs, the download speed of the server is not slow, it is not easy to drop the line, friends can often communicate online, and I like the achievement system with steam characteristics.
In short, if the quality of service is good, consumers will buy it, and other actions are nonsense. As a consumer, I will go to the one with good service quality.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 Comments
冰壁灵芝 17 Jun, 2022 @ 5:32pm 
同意。这不是什么“玩游戏还是玩平台”的问题。epic这种只知道用钱打压竞争对手的公司就不应该存在:steamthumbsup: