Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
they said so in a speech.
Someone else pointed out: playing a good game isn't like eating vegetables (for someone that doesn't like vegetables). It's just naturally enjoyable.
If it's true, that's a really weird approach to naming a company. But then again, they're comfortable with the weird and abnormal....so....
https://youtu.be/GfMsxjWgUbI?si=2o812C_tbrO7sPhu
Already known, stated and sourced in the curation made March 13 but thanks.
Great way to tell people to not take you seriously as a curator. You recommend Metal Gear Rising as a video game, is that a game with no politics according to your "quality control"?
Are you dyslexic or just retarded? There's video game built around political themes such as MGS V re-imagening a 40+ year old war with it's own made-up spin on things (even then it's more of a sneaking simulator and the plot is optional) and there's game that, key word here, *INJECT* modern IRL political agendas into them without any sort of coherency.