Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I still think it's a kick in the face of the PC gaming community that Valve, who know exactly what FOV is good for PC gamers, did not include the proper FOV from the start. It is literally one line of coding that needs to be changed; have they really become that lazy towards PC gamers?
It was actually one of the reasons why I cancelled my pre-order of L4D2 at the time of the demo's release. It was really disappointing to see this FOV and also to go back to a prehistoric viewmodel where the gun is glued to the right hand sight of the camera, rather than in the hands of a fully rendered model whose body was visible thru the FPS view. Why take a step back in this regard; it makes no sense.