Oh, ArtFunkel.

Who's ArtFunkle?

Change $ParallaxStrength in the VMTs to 0.
(Also, looking over the VMT, unless you know exactly what the following parameter does and you set it to 0.45 on purpose, change $Dilation to 0.5.)

All I can say is to try pushing the eye co-ordinates (both in $Model and the attachments) further backwards into the head. The shape of the eye mesh shouldn't matter at all.

๖ۣۜPhanto lähetti viestin:

if I use Absolute, the attachments seem to appear all the way below the model,

Please re-read my comment, then.

Firstly, change $SphereTexKillCombo to 0. I think it basically removes some of the eye rendering if the eye-"ball" doesn't intersect fully with the eye mesh.

Secondly, with such a huge negative Y value in the eye co-ordinates, shouldn't you be using $UpAxis -Y or something? If not, you definitely did something very wrong while getting the eye co-ordinates.

Thirdly, the eye attachments should generally match up with the eye definitions in $Model (except for X axis difference), which is best achieved while using the same co-ordinates as in $Model followed by "Absolute".

What is the entire QC and the entire VMT of one of the eyes?
Also, what orientation does the eye attachment have? (That's very important.)

Es'Kophan lähetti viestin:

Could you go over dmx and source 2, to find if dmx fully compatable with source2 or not?

The Blender Source Tools already has support for DMX for Source 2...

Well, for normal flexes, yes, but StudioMDL seems to complain because there can't both be normal flexes and vertex animation on the same part of the same model.

I don't think vertex animation has been implemented for DMX yet in the Blender Source Tools. Use SMD instead, so you'll get a VTA you can use. (Yes, you can use VTAs on DMX meshes. Even if the DMX has other flexes embedded already.)