Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

Originally posted by robomagon:

You are young.

I'm not, on the contrary.

Sorry, I thought I was the oldest one on here and I'm technically still considered to be in my "youth" for another couple years.

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

that's just for Sweden lmao

I doubt it's much different in the US.

It probably is different in the US, but that's because people seem more tolerant of such people in the Nordic countries. i.e. it's probably higher here because of outside influences.

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

i wish i could be young again

You are young.

And a lot of people wish for that. Some get into fitness and have plastic surgery done so they can look and feel as young as possible.

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

Originally posted by robomagon:

Neither. It's a physical problem.

Cogito ergo sum.

It is the mind that defines a person, not the body. The body can influence the mind, but a person only has personhood because of their mind. Without that, they're just a vegetable.

I totally love how you failed to applicate "cogito ergo sum".
Okay, let me toss this one at you.
If I think I am Napoleon, therefore I am Napoleon.
Is that true, then?

You'd be a Napoleon, not the Napoleon. As historical figures to model your life after, you could certainly do worse.

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

Originally posted by robomagon:

On the subject of political correctness: You seem to have a problem with me referring to her as "she". You also seem to disapprove of political correctness, as do I. So I find it odd that you're acting very PC at the moment. You want others to refer to her as a "he", when it's our right to call her whatever we like. You're trying to correct the political views of others to match your own. To make them refer to things the way you see them rather than the way they see them. That's exactly what I hate about political correctness.

wow holy shit i didn't actually think you would be this fucking dumb dude holy shit
Am I forwarding the narrative by being against something that is actually PC?
The simple fact of the matter is that he was born as a he, and will die as a he.
Convincing people to alter their political views has nothing to do with any of it.
None of that has anything to do with "political correctness" at all.
Meanwhile, you and others are forwarding the politically correct narrative for transgenderism.
At the same time, I am contesting and challenging transgenderism.

do you even know a thing about the frankfurt school?

You're not simply against something that's PC. You're being actively PC in your opposition to it. Like a feminist being sexist against men and thinking it's not exactly the same thing.

She was born a he, you think she's still a he, and that everyone should call her a he. She most likely thinks she was born a she in a he body, and that she's a she now, and that she should be called a she.

Both of those are PC views. An actual anti-PC stance is not to try and fight every PC view with and equal and opposite PC view of your own, but to simply make up your own damn mind and allow for everyone else to do the same.

And the Frankfurt school? Bunch of unrealistic, ideological, socialist BS from pre-WW2? I know enough of it to know that it's stupid. What of it?

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

Originally posted by robomagon:

True. Hopefully Kirnikovich just decides for himself rather than having a vote. At least that way we'll probably keep the current staff at the very least.

Oh boy, I'm completely reminded of the time you tried to argue that Krinkov shouldn't look back to this survey to have a little bit of an idea or a notion of potential candidates.
I bet you would be saying otherwise if you were ranking #1 on this thread.
Besides, didn't you also display some interest in being a mod?

I do recall saying that. And yes, I did decide to apply for a position around the same time you made this thread. And I still believe that having a democratic vote while also having an open borders policy is a terrible idea that would lead to an idiocracy.

Originally posted by UnofficialAether:

Prusak.

If he can't be mod, he should be Player of the Week

Yeah. Prusak for lifetime player of the week. After all, he is our mascot.

Originally posted by Gianfranco Stercoforti:

The medieval era was fucked

>If you were too attractive woman, you were a witch

By far the greatest evil ever commited by man. Just imagining how much that did to hinder the spread of attractive female genes makes me sick to my stomach.

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Gianfranco Stercoforti:

I'm on Steam Mobile, so I can't quote @Bad Allergies

According to Wikipedia, Pedophilia is "a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children."

The keywords are "primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children."

Apparently when he fucked the girl he was already 50 and he already fucked several women (polygamy is retarded imo), so he couldn't possibly have a "primary or exclusive attraction to prepubescent children." Which keeps him from entering the conventional meaning of Perophile.

Again, I'm not trying to justify his actions (I repeat this because when talking about religion, people start breathing really heavily and also smash their keyboards while writing a response, so...) but I'm all in for some convo about a topic as delicate as Islam.

You don't have to be a pedophile to commit pedophilia.

Pedophilia is a condition. A pedophile is a person afflicted with that condition. A pedophile can't "commit" pedophilia. They can however, commit child molestation.

Unfortunately, there don't seem to be any defined words for a middle ground between a pedophile and a non-pedophile like there is between homosexual and heterosexual (bisexual). Technically, pansexual could mean that a person was open to pedophilia, but it's too broad as it could also mean that they're open to practically anything else as well. Still, pansexual is probably the most correct term for someone who's sexually attracted to children, but not exclusively attracted to them.

Originally posted by Goldiecon99:

Originally posted by Dusty's Predecessor:

Well, he might be.
But pedophillia is illegal Right now. Atleast in saudi arabia.

meanwhile
the islamic state
is throwing gays off buildings
and out there demanding "convert or die"

Any sex outside of marriage is illegal in Saudi Arabia. And while you have to be 18 to get married there now, prior to 2013 there was no age restriction for marriage. And everyone who was already married to a child is still married to them and can still legally have sex with them.