theUSguy425 lähetti viestin:

Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart lähetti viestin:

This isn't controversial here.

It is in current year + 2. It's changing, though.

That reminds me, are those German chicks still planning to walk to Syria to get raped?

Shadowcon66 lähetti viestin:

... in trickery, this is going down in history!

Should be herstory since this is clearly a Pyrofish owned forum.

theUSguy425 lähetti viestin:

The Extreme Potato lähetti viestin:

"Decocracy is the worst form of goverment... except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." - Winston Churchill

Can you ask Churchill was 'decocracy' is?

I think it's like cuckcrazy.

Sexlexia

Hopefully they get arrested for conspiracy to commit terrorism. Releasing chemicals into a buildings vent system and sabotaging the fire suppression system are prety serious.

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

мιʟκмαn lähetti viestin:

Wait you're on her side now?

No, she deserves to be banned. But if she's unbanned she's going to act like she's never done anything wrong, and inevitably do something that is irrefutably ban worthy. There's no point in keeping up this autistic whining.

If people really think this ban was unjust then we should just unban her.

And then immediately perma ban her again for all the perfectly justified reasons she deserves one.

Shadowcon66 lähetti viestin:

мιʟκмαn lähetti viestin:

Good times


Spyro fuck yeah

You know what else was good?
Soul Reaver and Medievil!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YulwXPicfPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZYQdK0saCY

I wanted to replay the Blood Omen/Soul Reaver series but I couldn't get SR to run on my current computer. :(

nayul lähetti viestin:

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

Except pyrofish never did that

Except the other 99.9% of the time when she did nothing but that.

Bangiras lähetti viestin:

mods decided to permanently ban a user who didn't break any rules because of a petition

that alone is insane, but it gets worse:

the petition lasted 4 hours with ~35% of the active users unable to vote in time

the "ban" side won with a grand total of 4 more users, even though about 14 users had yet to vote

the petition was made by a notorious shitposter who readily admits to flamebaiting the user in question

the voters did not have to explain their answer, and the few explanations given boiled down to "she's mean, ban her"

Since when have voters ever had to explain their votes?

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

Pyrofish was being FRC's version of Dusty, and people got sick of her shit and made a petition to ban her - it passed. But the petition itself was only up for 4 hours, so Shadowcon used the Ludek defence, and claimed that the petition wasn't up long enough to be accurate. So now there's a counter petition going on to get her unbanned, but the original petition to ban her is locked.

It's incredibly autistic, and pointless. But people seem to care, for some strange reason.