Originally posted by Your daughter:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

More people would buy Bloodborne on PC than pretty much most of the stuff of Steam Greenlight put together.

Probably but it's not like greenlight is known for its quality anymore, just the opposite infact
I'm sure more people would buy console if it had more games like factorio too

Even if you ignore Greenlight, PC exclusives will also include indie junk, abandonware and shovelware making up the vast majority of the lot. PC certainly has more "exclusives", but bear in mind that Redneck Rampage and Grass Simulators both count equally with Metriod and The Last of Us.

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Originally posted by Geech:

HA SHE MADE A SHIT GAME

"Revolution 60 is a deliberate mixture of two games, Heavy Rain and Mass Effect."

>Deliberate mixture of Heavy Rain and Mass Effect
>Deliberate

One Heavy Rain was bad enough.

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

The few still being very much worth buying a console for, to many gamers. Sony and Nintendo have plenty of good recent exclusives.



So exactly what I said, games you have to hunt the physical copies for and no longer supported. We don't have Master Chief collection on PC yet, and it's been already two years.

What does Sony have? Uncharted and Bloodborne?

http://gematsu.com/exclusives/ps4

Except that you can simply order Halo 1 on Amazon and download Halo 2. You know nothing of what you're talking about.

If there's a service where you can buy and download a digital copy of Halo 2, I take it back. But Halo 1, as you agree, isn't available or supported on any PC digital store, there is no Halo 3, Halo 4 or the spinoff Halo games on PC either. You're literally talking about two games as if it was the entire series.

I also love that you ignored all the PC exclusives I listed which I personally think are better than any console exclusive I've played.

Your personal opinion on what you want isn't a concern of mines. Point is there are perfectly good games that will never be on PC, whether you personally want them or not. Most people can name at least a handful of console only games they'd love to have on PC.

Every platform can name "exclusives" to their advantage. PC isn't the only one. PC can claim to have the most "exclusives", but when 99% of it is garbage, it's not a very good claim. What good is Kimulator 2016 to someone who absolutely loves Mario Kart? You're literally equating the two.

Originally posted by Dr. Raven:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Actually warming up to the idea that you'll need to pass some sort of personality test if you want to play competitively online.

I expect people to pass and then become cancer afterwards because competitive gaming does that to people usually.

You only need one awful personality to a ruin a game for everyone in the match. Most people play competitive because they want to play and have fun, win or lost.

Originally posted by Your daughter:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Quality =/= Quantity.

And quality is not only subjective but always changing, so you can't really argue quality, only quanity which is objective

More people would buy Bloodborne on PC than pretty much most of the stuff of Steam Greenlight put together.

Anyone can put a game on Steam with little effort, at least the console vendors sponsor competent devs to make games that in turn make the platform more attractive.

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Yes it would be stupid to say that. Good thing I never made that claim.

If you really don't believe exclusives matter, then why even bother listing them?



You mean the version where you can only buy a second hand disc copy and no longer supported? Or did you mean the dismal Russian multiplayer-only version?

I didn't say exclusives didn't matter. I'm saying PC wins in terms of exclusives because consoles have barely any exclusives.

The few still being very much worth buying a console for, to many gamers. Sony and Nintendo have plenty of good recent exclusives.

By Halo I mean PC has two Halos currently and are getting all of the Xbox One Halos in the future. All Xbox One exclusives are going to be on PC. They're already doing it with a lot of games, like Gears of War.

So exactly what I said, games you have to hunt the physical copies for and no longer supported. We don't have Master Chief collection on PC yet, and it's been already two years.

What does Sony have? Uncharted and Bloodborne?

http://gematsu.com/exclusives/ps4

Originally posted by Ares:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

You go girl.

Serious question though: what has gamergate actually achieved?

Exposed corruption in [gaming] journalism.

Which is like exposing that water is wet. And the same journalists and websites still operate.

You go girl.

Serious question though: what has gamergate actually achieved?

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Quality =/= Quantity.

Sony makes deals to secure good games on their platform. You could put out any piece of shit just on the PC, and call it a PC exclusive. To be frank, just look at Steam Greenlight.

Just because not everyone has a game they want to come to PC, don't mean it's not a positive. Otherwise you might as well claim mods aren't an advantage for the PC, because not everyone is into modding. Or free multiplayer, or to be able to use any controller... the list goes on.

If The Last of Us, the Halo games, the Uncharted or God of War series came to PC, people would buy those games in droves. They aren't exactly sectional interests.

PC has quality exclusives, saying they don't is fucking ridiculous.

Yes it would be stupid to say that. Good thing I never made that claim.

If you really don't believe exclusives matter, then why even bother listing them?

By the way, PC does have Halo.

You mean the version where you can only buy a second hand disc copy and no longer supported? Or did you mean the dismal Russian multiplayer-only version?

Originally posted by Unicarn:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

If someone really want to play the next Final Fantasy or Hideo Kojima game, yes it is. And 99% of those exclusives on PC aren't necessarily going to cut it. Bloodborne is almost never coming to PC, that's a perfectly good reason to buy a PS if you want to play it.

And yes, it can go both ways too. Console gamers will never get to play Dota 2 or League of Legends, without a PC.



If someone really wants to play a classic PC game they somehow just can't play through DOSBox, virtual machines, or the like, they are perfectly fine to prefer the "old computer" to play videogames. And yes, it would count as a negative for the "newer" machine if it can't run legacy software going that far back.

It doesn't matter what a specific person wants in terms of which is better. PC is obviously superior in the exclusives department due to a MUCH higher amount of exclusives.

Quality =/= Quantity.

Sony makes deals to secure good games on their platform. You could put out any piece of shit just on the PC, and call it a PC exclusive. To be frank, just look at Steam Greenlight.

Just because not everyone has a game they want to come to PC, don't mean it's not a positive. Otherwise you might as well claim mods aren't an advantage for the PC, because not everyone is into modding. Or free multiplayer, or to be able to use any controller... the list goes on.

If The Last of Us, the Halo games, the Uncharted or God of War series came to PC, people would buy those games in droves. They aren't exactly sectional interests.