Originally posted by DED:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

It's discussing underaged sex, which is illegal. Is it ok to discuss things illegal under US law?

You mean that one comment? Yeu lets destory the thread because of that comment

No.

Except you dont have to pay for several months, and it's apparently cheap.

Originally posted by Evoxrus XV:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

Lock this thread

Has it been derailed?

It's discussing underaged sex, which is illegal. Is it ok to discuss things illegal under US law?

Originally posted by Evoxrus XV:

Wow.

Lock this thread

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

Why would you think they're related.

Having to cut their losses and try to break even?

No.

It's more than likely that, after how shit the netcode for the Wii U was, they've upgraded it, and it's expensive to maintain it. Probably the same with Microsoft and Sony.

Originally posted by Jake:

ill fucking save FRC
i am a hero

An hero.

Originally posted by Littlefoot:

Originally posted by Duckscout:

Well, still. Paying for online is fucking stupid. I like Nintendo for not doing that. But then again, they could never do it even if they wanted to.

I know right? But appareantly just because the Wii U sold poorly (which did not have to do with online), that causes Nintendo to suddenly change opinion on the whole thing about online play.

Why would you think they're related.

Originally posted by Littlefoot:

While i normally hate petitions like these, i cannot do anything but agree. Pyrofish has over the course of being in this group, caused more shitstorms than anyone else combined.

She also often does it for no reason other than attention-whoring or wanting to piss someone off, even if the thread itself isn't meant for it.

She's got a massive ego, and it's time we take some action.

>thinking well of yourself is attention-whoring, and only to piss people off

Figures a horsefucker would have low self-worth. :^)

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

>targeted meat
See, if you left that out, it would have been believable to someone. But considering Meat straight out said he's trying to get me and him banned, and there was a huge thing to get me unbanned after he got me banned, it's obvious that's bullshit.

Stake, for example, fucking hates me, amd was adamantly against me joining.

And they're allowed to vote. Are you going to say their vote doesn't matter because you say so?

Overalls, he did it because you actively flame people. He was pissed because the staff didn't do shit.

how could the staff do shit when I wasn't in the group

Their vote does matter.
i didn't say they weren't. They can vote for whatever reason regardless.

Then why mention that

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Corneye:

It's the same 11 retards who keep circlejerking about her, what does that prove?
You'll be outvotred eventually, and even if it does go through, it's only going to cause more drama, which is probably what you want.

Not really.
Overalls, pyrofish did target alot of people, like meat, Me, and etc.
Krinkov and evo voted yes, so Hopefully it wont be outvoted.

>targeted meat
See, if you left that out, it would have been believable to someone. But considering Meat straight out said he's trying to get me and him banned, and there was a huge thing to get me unbanned after he got me banned, it's obvious that's bullshit.

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

A difference of 3 people, currently. And again, a good lot of people have grudges.

provide it.
And some of those who voted No are from forum filth, and came here to shitpost.

Stake, for example, fucking hates me, amd was adamantly against me joining.

And they're allowed to vote. Are you going to say their vote doesn't matter because you say so?