Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by Geech:

You do not stick your dick in literally anything that moves just because other people have a pet dog, that is the idiocy that will send us back into the fucking stone ages.

Can you answer the question though? Can you actually come up with any logical answer to it instead of just paraphrasing "it's just wrong"?

Okay, here's the thing.

You're implying that because dogs and pets are companions, we should stick our dicks in them and ride them all day erry day because COMPANIONSHIP!

You don't just go up to your friend, and then fuck him because he's got morning wood.

Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by Geech:

Holy fuck, what's next, is somebody gonna pull the "ALL ZOOS ARE EVIL JAILS!" shit out of their ass like an edgy teen?

Cause only edgy teens and idiots support Beastiality and claim that domestication is a form of slavery, because there can't just be companions amirite?

I don't believe that dogs are slaves. My point was that if we start looking at the treatment of animals from a human perspective, then many of the things we do to domesticated animals become horrible when judged from the same perspective. But they're not human, so we shouldn't judge our treatment of them as if they were. So I'll ask, exactly what makes sexual activity with an animal not qualify as a form of "companionship", while training them to do other tasks they neither understand nor consent to does?

You do not stick your dick in literally anything that moves just because other people have a pet dog, that is the idiocy that will send us back into the fucking stone ages.

Holy fuck, what's next, is somebody gonna pull the "ALL ZOOS ARE EVIL JAILS!" shit out of their ass like an edgy teen?

Cause only edgy teens and idiots support Beastiality and claim that domestication is a form of slavery, because there can't just be companions amirite?

Originally posted by イキ シツボ:

itt: insane polandfag patriots

It's like being a proud Icelander.

What the fuck have you done.

Originally posted by イキ シツボ:

lol small insignificant country that adopts history of the past to look like heroes lmao

BUT WE SAVED THE ENTIRETY OF EUROPE FROM RUSSIA!!!1111

Originally posted by Prusak the Difficulty Tweaker:

Originally posted by Geech:

Turks are even worse than Russians though.

Could you stop talking stereotypes and start talking historical facts?

I don't need historical facts, now go get taken over by your actually successful big brother or something.

Originally posted by Prusak the Difficulty Tweaker:

Originally posted by Geech:

Are.. are you implying that Russia was ever an actual threat to anyone outside of their home country before nukes?

That's like defending against a bunch of drunken koalas. In snowsuits.

...

What about the Ottoman empire?

Because they wanted to do the same thing and got the same results

Turks are even worse than Russians though.

Originally posted by Prusak the Difficulty Tweaker:

Originally posted by Geech:

I stopped caring when you implied proto-Germany saved all of Europe.

Russians started a campaign to conquer Europe
They stopped at Poland
And came back

Are.. are you implying that Russia was ever an actual threat to anyone outside of their home country before nukes?

That's like defending against a bunch of drunken koalas. In snowsuits.

Originally posted by Prusak the Difficulty Tweaker:

Originally posted by Geech:

So you "saved" a country that inevitabley has begun to tear itself apart, and before that was run by inbreds.

Good job.

I stopped caring when you said Europe was a country

I stopped caring when you implied proto-Germany saved all of Europe.

Originally posted by Prusak the Difficulty Tweaker:

Originally posted by Geech:

Yeah, you did nothing interesting then either.

Except saving Europe twice as I mentioned before

So you "saved" a country that inevitabley has begun to tear itself apart, and before that was run by inbreds.

Good job.