I wanna die via lightning rod

Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by Geech:

Man shut the fuck up with your edgy bullshit.

The Bible is "edgy" now?

No you're edgy af.

Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by Geech:

God in general is a dick.

Now go worship Him or He will punish you! Also, He loves you. That's why it's OK when He hurts you.

Man shut the fuck up with your edgy bullshit.

Originally posted by Amsel :D:

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Not an opinion, but people get angry when I tell them Delilah did not cut Samson's hair.

Check Judges 18 if you don't believe me.

That whole thing was a giant dick move on (((god's))) part.

>person's entire life is dedicated to serving you
>let him get his fucking eyes gouged out and ruin his life because of an autistic hair fetish

God in general is a dick.

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Not an opinion, but people get angry when I tell them Delilah did not cut Samson's hair.

Check Judges 18 if you don't believe me.

Why is that so important that people get mad about it?

I have no idea who those people are.. it's biblical isn't it?

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

Originally posted by Geech:

Well duh, but most furfags I know don't wanna just fuck dogs and shiet.

Quixenare aside.

Still, they are indeed sexually attracted to anthro-animals.

The animal part is playing a big role in this fetish, so technically it is zoophilia.
Even if the only sexual part is masturbation most of the times, due to the fact that anthro-animals aren't real.

Well no shit.

By technicality if you wanna get REALLY semantic, humans are part of the animal kingdom, so we could say that everyone is a zoophilliac, but that would be AUTISM.

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

Originally posted by Geech:

I'd say that's relatively different because the subject of the porn is still... humanoid.

You can't say that the focus of the fetish is on the humanoid shape, because without the animal part it would defeat the whole purpose of that said fetish by turning it into regular porn.

Well duh, but most furfags I know don't wanna just fuck dogs and shiet.

Quixenare aside.

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

Originally posted by Geech:

Are you referring to Feral porn?

That's usually two animals going at it IIRC.

No, furry pornographic content in general.

I'd say that's relatively different because the subject of the porn is still... humanoid.

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

>borderline

Borderline in general. Actually, the "border" is crossed quite often.

Are you referring to Feral porn?

That's usually two animals going at it IIRC.

I am gay as FUCK