STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
15
IN-GAME
84
ONLINE
Founded
11 January, 2016
Language
English
Location
Singapore 
I'm going to be honest here
I don't think Pyrofish should have been banned.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
You have been permanently banned from all Forum Regulars Connected discussions.
You have been banned by a forum moderator.
Reason: "Dear Pyrofish, Pyrofish, due to your behavior (Especially when you were instructed not to cause problems) right after you weren't elected as a moderator, I have deem it necessary to ban you from this group
What behaviour?
Pointing out that you completely ignored a legitimate vote in favour of her becoming mod for no obvious reasons besides "They might be ironically voting" (which is not a real reason, you may as well of said "because I said so") is not behavior that is ban worthy.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
as well as the fact that you broke the rules of the conditions when coming here. An example of this is, "6th. You cannot go and bait and purposely stir up topics that will lead to chaos, flamewars and such in the group".
Those rules were never enforced in the first place. Now you pull them out just because she did something you didn't like. Besides, she never intentionally broke them. People over reacted to anything she posted about the subject. Hell, a few people were essentially ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ in all of her threads (you know who you are) and they haven't recieved any repercussions yet she is banned because they just so happen to be her threads.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
And yet you kept going on and continued to do so, causing drama, flamewars
Again, she never intentionally did that. It was people over reacting to anything she posted. The only way she could have not "caused drama and flamewars" is by not posting at all. Which is just stupid.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
insulting
Yes she insulted people. But she did it only when people insulted her first. Which, if I recall, was allowed.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
and baiting people in famewars
That never happened. Any flamewars that occured in threads she posted in were not directly her fault and were due to people over reacting to anything she posted and arguing with the people who agreed with what she posted.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
that also derailed a couple of threads.
Again, not her fault. She posted in a thread and people bought the argument over from other threads for no reason other than to spite her.

Originally posted by Pyrofish:
Because of this, I will have to ban you."

I really think you should reconcider this decision...
Last edited by The Extreme Potato; 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:25am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 157 comments
G_lad 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:21am 
Plz unban
amelia 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:22am 
I believe we're shortening the ban to a month or so, for what its worth. In hindsight, a permanent ban isn't remotely justified in this case.
76109108007942031 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:22am 
She flamebaited several times, most recently on the thread that was just deleted. She agreed that she will be banned if she does any of this.

Of course a perma ban might be a bit much, but I think at least a temp was deserved.
Kptn Howdy 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:24am 
She broke the sixth rule in her agreement.

It was accepted that she would get a perma if she broke said agreement
Vroomi 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:30am 
Jeezus.
Ludek 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:30am 
It was deserved.
j. 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:30am 
Can we get over this already?
The Extreme Potato 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:31am 
Originally posted by Jens-o(est):
Can we get over this already?
"Can we get over an unfair ban that happened an hour ago?"

No
amelia 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:32am 
Originally posted by Neko Cup's glorious BattleGirls:
Originally posted by BBE4 Darkanine:
I believe we're shortening the ban to a month or so, for what its worth. In hindsight, a permanent ban isn't remotely justified in this case.
Wait really?
Well, we're trying to get it shortened to a month.
Kptn Howdy 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:34am 
Originally posted by BBE4 Darkanine:
Originally posted by Neko Cup's glorious BattleGirls:
Wait really?
Well, we're trying to get it shortened to a month.


Originally posted by Kptn Howdy:
She broke the sixth rule in her agreement.

It was accepted that she would get a perma if she broke said agreement
Littlefoot 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:36am 
Your insulting part is majorly flawed. There have been countless times that Pyrofish has been insulting people in this group, even when they didn't flame her in the first place.
The Extreme Potato 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:38am 
Originally posted by Kptn Howdy:
Originally posted by BBE4 Darkanine:
Well, we're trying to get it shortened to a month.


Originally posted by Kptn Howdy:
She broke the sixth rule in her agreement.

It was accepted that she would get a perma if she broke said agreement
If you actually bothered to read my post instead of posting some stupid comment like you usually do, then you'll know that it wasn't Pyrofish's fault. It was due to people like you flaming her and shitposting is her discussions.
76109108007942031 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:38am 
Originally posted by Littlefoot:
Your insulting part is majorly flawed. There have been countless times that Pyrofish has been insulting people in this group, even when they didn't flame her in the first place.
I'm pretty sure a lot of those insults were meant to be jokes. Granted they were pretty rude and not very funny, but humour is subjective.
The Extreme Potato 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:40am 
Originally posted by Sir Illic:
Originally posted by Littlefoot:
Your insulting part is majorly flawed. There have been countless times that Pyrofish has been insulting people in this group, even when they didn't flame her in the first place.
I'm pretty sure a lot of those insults were meant to be jokes. Granted they were pretty rude and not very funny, but humour is subjective.
This tbh

People over react to her banter and start flame wars
Ludek 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:40am 
Originally posted by The Extreme Potato:
Originally posted by Jens-o(est):
Can we get over this already?
"Can we get over an unfair ban that happened an hour ago?"

No
It was fair.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 157 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 29 Sep, 2016 @ 10:20am
Posts: 156