It's not a buying market rn.
I'd wait a few years and enjoy the build you have.

since the rtx pro 6000 exists, shouldnt you be spending energy being upset about that cards price tag instead?

Oprindeligt skrevet af Bind0fGod:

It's not a buying market rn.
I'd wait a few years and enjoy the build you have.

In other words, buying GPUs has now become as volatile as real estate. :(

I hope Sony really steps it up with the next Playstation. I imagine even a $1000 price tag would look great next to this mess that is PC GPUs today.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Caldari Ghost:

since the rtx pro 6000 exists, shouldnt you be spending energy being upset about that cards price tag instead?

That looks like a workstation prototype. When the a 6090 Liquid cooled model releases, we'll see. But I'm pretty sure it's not going down in price.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shapely Twig:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Bind0fGod:

It's not a buying market rn.
I'd wait a few years and enjoy the build you have.

In other words, buying GPUs has now become as volatile as real estate. :(

I hope Sony really steps it up with the next Playstation. I imagine even a $1000 price tag would look great next to this mess that is PC GPUs today.

I have a 7900xtx.
I'm personally waiting for AMD to release something that's a decent upgrade for that.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Bind0fGod:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shapely Twig:

In other words, buying GPUs has now become as volatile as real estate. :(

I hope Sony really steps it up with the next Playstation. I imagine even a $1000 price tag would look great next to this mess that is PC GPUs today.

I have a 7900xtx.
I'm personally waiting for AMD to release something that's a decent upgrade for that.

If AMD can release a card that is close to the 5090 even a full year from now, I would be fully onboard (assuming they are actually available).

But even the 4090 struggles to maintain 120fps at 4K for many games, so more power is needed.

What monitor resolution and refresh rate are you running?

The RTX 4090 is still a seriously good graphics card for even 4K resolution. Plus you still have Physx to support older games.

The RTX 5090 on the other hand is 4x AI Frame Generation, so if you want UltraHD 4K with RayTracing and 120Hz+. This AI Frame Generation was rubbish at first, but improves greatly over time with the driver updates. They have supercomputers running 24/7 improving upon the latest games. So if your monitor and psu (power supply) supports that, then it future proofs too. AI Frame Generation is getting better quality than the original games these days. Yet it will also use more power to juice.

You can still sit pretty sweet with a RTX 4090.

It just depends what you really want to juice?

ps: I've used them both personally and I love them both for different reasons.

pss: Factor in your motherboard / cpu and psu (power supply) too. Then the monitor which can only dish out whatever it's given. Plus what games do you play the most? Latest or older?

games aren't scratching the surface of what a 4090 can do. There is 0 incentive to upgrade. Also, I've heard the 5000 series is overly reliant on AI, requiring more specific setups. The 4090 is the only time i've seen a graphics card go up in value after the initial release because they discontinued it.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shapely Twig:

But even the 4090 struggles to maintain 120fps at 4K for many games, so more power is needed.

I am betting the bottle neck isn't the gpu.