All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
Should we consider Denazification Laws?
We know the Germans did it after the war, but should we as Americans (for those of us who are) let the millions who have sacrificed and died, only for their sacrifice to see people run for political offices and judgeships, or nominated for such?

Of course we have Freedom Of Speech Laws, but those freedoms should not entail fascist idealogies running for political office or thru our courts.

And worse, implementing such policies.

WW2 was the last legal declared war. We did not declare war against communists. And communism happens thru coups generally. We already have the Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Laws.

Though our courts seems to be ignoring and weakening that.

I feel just because we are no longer at war, does not mean Fascism is not Treason. It is.

I propose when the opposition gets in, if its not too late already, Denazification Laws should be introduced.

Thanks for listening.

Your Pal,

Ranger :steamhappy:
Last edited by xBCxRangers; 13 hours ago
< >
Showing 1-15 of 158 comments
What outspoken Nazi is running for office or as a judge?
No, because lefties consider everyone with opinions they don't like Nazis.
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
What outspoken Nazi is running for office or as a judge?

Mr Trump and many of his sycophants promote fascist idealogies. The idealogies have to be scrutinized, and laws created to prevent these actions.

It does not mean, one cannot speak of fascist idealogies. It does not mean they will not be allowed to be spoke or shown in public discourse. We do have Freedoms of Speech protections.

But premisies of white supremacy, the use of troops in cities, talk of abridging the constitution running for third terms, talks of Insurrection Acts whilst no insurrection, judges abridging our freedoms against Posse Comitatus laws, all should be deemed fasco manifesto, and those should be immediately charged and removed from office. Or prevented from running or nomination.
Last edited by xBCxRangers; 14 hours ago
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
We know the Germans did it after the war, but should we as Americans (for those of us who are) let the millions who have sacrificed and died, only for their sacrifice to see people run for political offices and judgeships, or nominated for such?

Of course we have Freedom Of Speech Laws, but those freedoms should not entail fascist idealogies running for political office or thru our courts.

WW2 was the last legal declared war. We did not declare war against communists. And communism happens thru coups generally. We already have the Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Laws.

Though our courts seems to be ignoring and weakening that.

I feel just because we are no longer at war, does not mean Fascism is not Treason. It is.

I propose when the opposition gets in, if its not too late already, Denazification Laws should be introduced.

Thanks for listening.

Your Pal,

Ranger :steamhappy:

Being a fascist is not illegal.

The Nazis were not prosecuted at Nuremberg for being Fascists.

They were prosecuted for murdering people and committing war crimes.

Political murder can happen under any political ideology. Just look ANTIFA and how it attempted to murder Andy Ngo and many others and is radicalising people to commit murder.
Cracking down on something whose definition is constantly expanding and becoming increasingly more vague doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
What outspoken Nazi is running for office or as a judge?

Mr Trump and many of his sycophants promote fascist idealogies. The idealogies have to be scrutinized, and laws created to prevent these actions.

It does not mean, one cannot speak of fascist idealogies. It does not mean they will not be allowed.

But premisies of white supremacy, the use of troops in cities, talk of abridging the constitution running for third terms, judges abridging our freedoms against Posse Comitatus laws, all should be deemed fasco manifesto, and those should be immediately charged and removed from office.
All of those are heavily scrutinized and some even currently blocked.
Originally posted by Lobster Moth:
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
We know the Germans did it after the war, but should we as Americans (for those of us who are) let the millions who have sacrificed and died, only for their sacrifice to see people run for political offices and judgeships, or nominated for such?

Of course we have Freedom Of Speech Laws, but those freedoms should not entail fascist idealogies running for political office or thru our courts.

WW2 was the last legal declared war. We did not declare war against communists. And communism happens thru coups generally. We already have the Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Laws.

Though our courts seems to be ignoring and weakening that.

I feel just because we are no longer at war, does not mean Fascism is not Treason. It is.

I propose when the opposition gets in, if its not too late already, Denazification Laws should be introduced.

Thanks for listening.

Your Pal,

Ranger :steamhappy:

Being a fascist is not illegal.

My contention is that is should be. We fought a war and millions have died and were unalived.

The fact the war is over, should not mean these are not treasonous idealogies. They are.
Originally posted by Lobster Moth:
Political murder can happen under any political ideology. Just look ANTIFA and how it attempted to murder Andy Ngo and many others and is radicalising people to commit murder.
^ This has never happened btw
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

let the millions who have sacrificed and died

Why do democrats hate the military?
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
Originally posted by Lobster Moth:

Being a fascist is not illegal.

My contention is that is should be. We fought a war and millions have died and were unalived.

The fact the war is over, should not mean these are not treasonous idealogies. They are.
That's literally thought crime.
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
What outspoken Nazi is running for office or as a judge?

Mr Trump and many of his sycophants promote fascist idealogies.

name one

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
The idealogies have to be scrutinized, and laws created to prevent these actions.

They were scrutinised, by the American people and the American people chose to return Donald Trump to the US Presidency.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

But premisies of white supremacy,

What promises would those be?

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
the use of troops in cities

That would be the National Guard. Who are there to be deployed in cities which are out of control, in this case, with crime. There have been double digit percentage drops in the rate of crime in every city the National Guard has been deployed to and polls show massive support from the populations of those cities for this.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
talk of abridging the constitution running for third terms

This amendment was only brought in in 1947. What precisely is the argument against unamending it? FDR had three terms.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
judges abridging our freedoms against Posse Comitatus laws, all should be deemed fasco manifesto, and those should be immediately charged and removed from office.

Examples?
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
Originally posted by Lobster Moth:

Being a fascist is not illegal.

My contention is that is should be. We fought a war and millions have died and were unalived.

The fact the war is over, should not mean these are not treasonous idealogies. They are.

Well thank God you're not in charge of anything then.

And if you want to be, put it in a manifesto and run for President.
Last edited by Lobster Moth; 14 hours ago
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

My contention is that is should be. We fought a war and millions have died and were unalived.

The fact the war is over, should not mean these are not treasonous idealogies. They are.
That's literally thought crime.

As was said, its not the thought, but the action.
Originally posted by Lobster Moth:
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

Mr Trump and many of his sycophants promote fascist idealogies.

name one

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
The idealogies have to be scrutinized, and laws created to prevent these actions.

They were scrutinised, by the American people and the American people chose to return Donald Trump to the US Presidency.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:

But premisies of white supremacy,

What promises would those be?

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
the use of troops in cities

That would be the National Guard. Who are there to be deployed in cities which are out of control, in this case, with crime. There have been double digit percentage drops in the rate of crime in every city the National Guard has been deployed to and polls show massive support from the populations of those cities for this.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
talk of abridging the constitution running for third terms

This amendment was only brought in in 1947. What precisely is the argument against unamending it? FDR had three terms.

Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
judges abridging our freedoms against Posse Comitatus laws, all should be deemed fasco manifesto, and those should be immediately charged and removed from office.

Examples?
FDR was the reason for the amendment. He tried to stack the court and take control so they made sure no one could try and copy him.

FDR is literally the argument against allowing more than 2 terms.
Originally posted by xBCxRangers:
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
That's literally thought crime.

As was said, its not the thought, but the action.
An ideology is a thought.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 158 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details