Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This Expo event has been going on for years.
I think it would also be strange if steam did a "White Devs Expo". Dividing devs by race feels weird, to say the least.
It is my understanding that highlighting a dev purely because they are or are not a certain race is inherently racist?
And if anyone thinks that this is a joke. It's not. It's a condition called Argyria.
I actually care more about their Statement:
"
..."The mission of Game Devs of Color Expo is to amplify the creative power held by people of color in games.
We do this by organizing revolutionary events, uniting our vibrant community, and building access to knowledge, funding, and opportunities.
Creators of color make great games but are often pushed to the margins. We fight to create a better games industry that is intersectional and equitable.
Watch this space for our broadcasts of the GDoCExpo Direct, demo showcase, dev interviews, and award ceremony, right here on Steam!"...
I think something like this, does the opposite of what they claim its for. You cant unite by exclusion, you can try to represent their work, yes but in this case its marketing. To be honest not really better its an objectification, in this case skincolor, to explain it simple its nothing more like the sex sells argument. Of course if you view it as a marketing strategy.
If not its still excluding while trying to be inclusive, I really dont get that. Do the same with Mexicans or Japanese or people from a random town in North India. They all would exclude a sizeble audience base.
Creativity (creating games) is to my knowledge a mix of skill, determination, knowledge, innate talent and the wish to create. So to say brainpower made reality. Last I checked their brains are the same as everyone else, so why reduce yourself to the color of your skin?
I really mean that, I dont doubt there are rasist people on the planet, but I never checked who made my game. At least not often, so I doubt there is any random racism towards faceless games and yes for me it does not matter what color my protagonist has.
This just seems counter to the goal mentioned. At least in my eyes.
But is that still the case? I doubt it. It seems only america still sees it this way. I think as mentioned before, its counterproductiv. To exclude anyone in the name of inclusion just holds the sentiment it still happens alive, instead of letting real inclusion exist.
My opinion of someone's accomplishment isn't really shifted positively just because they are or are not a member of a certain race or vague ethnic group, that doesn't pop into my mind as a deciding factor when I'm shopping for video games.
Do you mean to imply this is mainly just meant to focus on black american game devs? That seems rather specific and equally strange.
Didnt even think about this part, if thats only applied to america and it is shown on a global platform doesn´t this do the opposit of achieving equality?
Shame on, Valve.