安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Could there be a sequel at some point? I suppose. It's hard to say "oh well multiplayer is meant as the continuation of the campaign", when Fenris is not a playable (or even a fully realized) faction within the game.
The campaign itself was fine for what it was, but I do find it slightly irksome to tease such a potentially epic campaign, when there are no guarantees it will be delivered. A shame too, as I was hoping we'd get to see Vesna enter the fray.
And I doubt at this stage they can present proper conclusion to the story, without plot holes and without it being rushed.
That's the key word - "Trying". One thing is to MAKE an unknown cliffhanger, and other - TRY to. And in my opinion, it ended up rather lackluster and at times confusing, and at times - just odd.
Simply having a story that ... *Snip~!*
Ah, so you mean like The Sopranos?