It is fully possible to run Ezbench on Linux through emulation, and a few people do that.
However: Our new, commercial version later this year/early 25 will have libraries that are dependent on things that Linux does not support.

It seems that you are somewhat confused about what Unreal Engine is and how we use it, but just "write directly for DirectX" makes no sense.

> through emulation

it's not the same like native

> libraries that are dependent on things that Linux does not support

1. The UNREAL Engine has a complete linux support! And alle other can be written with multiplatform c++, like QT or with an own c++ lib.

2. Then produce 2 different versions (linux + windows), specifically when you like to charge money for a test software.

Ursprungligen skrivet av marantis.tv:

> through emulation

it's not the same like native

> libraries that are dependent on things that Linux does not support

1. The UNREAL Engine has a complete linux support! And alle other can be written with multiplatform c++, like QT or with an own c++ lib.

2. Then produce 2 different versions (linux + windows), specifically when you like to charge money for a test software.

If we get enough interest to cover Linux development cost, it is definitively something we will consider. We also do on demand create custom benchmarks for B2B customers, so if there is a specific need and use case, our services are available at a reasonable price point.

We do however not have plans to write this for Linux due to lacking interest or customer base. (We would need thousands of paying Linux users to justify the cost).

Currently, my setup - 7900xtx, 7700x - runs the Photogrammetry Test on Linux (Garuda) at a frame rate comparable to Windows (60-70 fps), but absolutely tanks on the particle test, running at around 16fps average compared to 70-80 fps on Windows. Not sure why.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Hank Baxter:

Currently, my setup - 7900xtx, 7700x - runs the Photogrammetry Test on Linux (Garuda) at a frame rate comparable to Windows (60-70 fps), but absolutely tanks on the particle test, running at around 16fps average compared to 70-80 fps on Windows. Not sure why.

Hm, interesting. I believe that it may be related to multi-thread workload perhaps?
Niagara does rely on multi-threading, esp for some of the CPU heavy stuff.