安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Very PS3, Very Nathan Drake
Bro this is so on point lol, it had that washed out PlayStation look!
CSGO to me was ugly because it tried to be realistic, like Dust was some arabic city rather than just. . . Dust. It's like a mental illness the devs have that make them try to qualify everything into reality.
CS2 to me is easily the worst entry into the series. Zero art direction. Zero audio that I enjoy. The new maps from Valve I applaud in their own right, but they're not very Counter-Strike. CS was never a perfect game, and now there is this annoying focus to make it 'perfect' through level design, and so classic maps like Aztec are given the middle finger and they delete community servers, so most of this game is just a pipe dream in people's heads.
Their Linux port is so bad it's been unplayable on a lot of systems since start. And that's after watching shaders precompile for 15-30 minutes and hang.
Everyone hated Aztec, i also. And the Worst entry is CS CZ.
Hold on there, CS:CZ has...uh...a wonderful personality...if you get to know her. Just turn the light off when you play, it all feels the same in the dark.
is
the gameplay
csgo better
but the fun
still , csgo better