安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
10 
檢舉此篇文章
How would a special counter this? Very good question.
Maybe some kind of AoE attack that fatigues you, reducing the effectiveness of the bash and making you slower. Putting heavy priority on killing it, as it affects everyone.
It's a really ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ annoying counter but probably needed. Tho the flow of the game is not in a miserable state of unbalance or anything.
The text does not match the headline.
The headline asks for survivor strategys
in the text he asks whether this or that SI alteration could be good or fun. I was answering to his text.
The title asks what the strongest survivor strategies are
Paragraph 1 explains why I want to know that (I'm thinking of SI concepts, but they need to exist to counter a specific strategy; hence, what are the strongest strategies)
Paragraph 2 gives an example of a strong strategy to show what kind of responses I'm looking for (camping a long corridor is a strong strategy)
Paragraph 3 explains how this strong strategy would be countered by a new SI, linking the title to the reasoning behind the post.
Whereas your reply doesn't list a single survivor strategy, then you bring up versus mode and mods which have nothing to do with the topic.